Delhi riots: Court grants bail to man, says no witness identified accused in CCTV footage

Court granted the relief to Aleem Saifi on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs 30,000 with one surety of like amount in the case of alleged murder of Vinod Kumar during riots.

Published: 30th November 2020 06:17 PM  |   Last Updated: 30th November 2020 06:17 PM   |  A+A-

Court Hammer, judgement, order, Gavel

For representational purposes


NEW DELHI: The court has granted bail to a man in a murder case related to the north east Delhi riots, saying no witness or police was able to identify him, even in a CCTV camera footage.

The case relates to the killing of a local, Vinod Kumar, during the communal violence that broke out after clashes between citizenship law supporters and protesters spiralled out of control on February 24.

The riots left at least 53 people dead and around 200 injured.

Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat granted the relief to Aleem Saifi on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs 30,000 with one surety of like amount in the case of alleged murder of Kumar during riots in the Jafrabad area of north east Delhi.

The court said though the offence committed was "very serious", the role of Saifi has to be seen.

"The applicant/accused Aleem Saifi was arrested at the pointing out and identification of co-accused Arshad.

Co­-accused Arshad has identified him in the CCTV footage of Gali No 1, Chauhan Bangar (Akhade Wali Gali) near the place of the incident.

In the CCTV footage, accused/alleged Aleem Saifi is allegedly seen from his back and his face is seen for a split second," it said.

"The person shown as applicant/accused by the prosecution in the CCTV footage is vehemently denied by the counsel for the accused.

There is no witness, public or police who has identified the applicant as the person involved in the present case or the same person shown by the prosecution in the footage.

There is only an identification by co-accused Arshad," the court said in its order passed on November 26.

The court directed Saifi not to tamper with evidence or leave Delhi without its permission.

During the hearing, advocate Abdul Gaffar, appearing for Saifi, said the complainant, Kumar's son Nitin, did not state in his FIR that he can identify any of the assailants who were rioting on the road.

There were also no specific allegations against the accused of using any violent force against the complainant, he said.

The CCTV footage, allegedly showing Saifi, did not depict him and it was a case of mistaken identity as he was not the same person as shown by the prosecution in the video, Gaffar claimed.

Special Public Prosecutor Jinendra Jain, appearing for the police, opposed the bail plea saying Saifi was arrested on the basis of the statement of the co-accused, who had also identified others in the CCTV camera footage.

Nitin has stated in the FIR, that on February 24, when he was riding his bike with his father, a stone hit Kumar.

In the FIR, he further said that when they got up, around 100 to 150 people came with sticks, stones and other weapons and attacked them.

The mob burnt the motorcycle and beat them up, due to which Kumar died, according to the FIR.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp