Supreme Court upholds right of Delhi Legislative Assembly to proceed on grounds of breach of privilege

The Supreme Court upheld the right of the Delhi Legislative Assembly to proceed on grounds of breach of privilege.

Published: 08th July 2021 11:58 PM  |   Last Updated: 08th July 2021 11:58 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (File Photo| EPS)


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Thursday upheld the right of the Delhi Legislative Assembly to proceed on grounds of breach of privilege and said it has the power to compel attendance by initiating privilege proceedings.

A bench headed by Justice S K Kaul said it cannot accept the plea that an Assembly must confine itself to the core function of legislation and this would be unreasonably restricting the role of an elected body.

The top court said that complexity of communal tensions and their wide-ranging ramifications is a matter affecting citizens of Delhi and it cannot be said that the Government of NCT of Delhi cannot look into the causal factors in order to formulate appropriate remedial measures.

Appropriate recommendations made by the State Government in this regard could be of significance in the collaborative effort between the Centre and the State to deal with governance issues, the apex court said.

"We are of the view that because of the pervasive impact of the riots, the Committee could legitimately attend to such grievances encompassing varied elements of public life.

Thus, it would be entitled to receive information and deliberate on the same to examine their bearing on peace and harmony without transgressing into any fields reserved for the Union Government in the Seventh Schedule," the bench said.

The apex court said that it is the State Government and the State Assembly which has to deal with the ground reality even in the dual power structure in Delhi.

"If we may say so, it is only the factum of Delhi being the capital and the sensitivities arising therefrom in respect of public order or police which has possibly persuaded these powers to be retained by the Central Government.

"We cannot say that informed deliberation inter alia on the best measures through which online mass hate and violence in their geographical jurisdiction can be addressed would not be within the Committee's area of competence as it would undermine the very purpose of a vital democratic polity," the bench said.

The apex court, however, said that the division of powers between the Centre and the State Assemblies must be mutually respected.

"The concept of a wide reading of Entries cannot be allowed to encroach upon a subject matter where there is a specific entry conferring power on the other body. It is this very principle which was in the minds of the Constitution makers, considering the wide diversity and the federal nature of the country," the bench also comprising Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy said.

The observations came in a judgement by which the top court dismissed the plea of Facebook India Vice President and MD Ajit Mohan challenging the summons issued by the Delhi Assembly's Peace and Harmony committee for failing to appear before it as witness in connection with the north-east Delhi riots matter.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp