Court rejects plea for custodial interrogation of Navneet Kalra, remanded to judicial custody

Kalra, who was produced before the court on expiry of his three days of police custody, was sent to 14 days of judicial custody.

Published: 20th May 2021 10:59 PM  |   Last Updated: 20th May 2021 10:59 PM   |  A+A-

Businessman Navneet Kalra

Businessman Navneet Kalra (Photo| Instagram)


NEW DELHI: A court here on Thursday rejected the plea of Delhi Police seeking five more days of custodial interrogation of businessman Navneet Kalra in connection with allegedly hoarding and black marketing life-saving oxygen concentrators and called it "flawed".

Kalra, who was produced before the court on expiry of his three days of police custody, was sent to 14 days of judicial custody.

The order was passed by Metropolitan Magistrate Akanksha Garg of Saket court.

The judge said that police's contention to secure Kalra's custody on the grounds that the mirror images of his recovered mobile phones are yet to be created, or the data from the laptop is yet to be segregated is flawed at the outset.

"Whatever substantial had to be achieved by the investigating agency through the police remand of the accused has already been achieved and no fruitful purpose would be served by extending the police custody of the accused," the metropolitan magistrate said.

Rejecting the police's remand application, the district judge added that offence in the present case is of grave nature and has serious implications upon the society at large but the courts of law are not expected to be carried away by public sentiment.

The court cannot authorise detention merely because some stringent and non­-bailable sections have been slapped upon the accused by the prosecution, the court said, adding that it is their sacrosanct responsibility to apply their judicial mind.

The judge added, "In the light of the submissions made by the IO wherein all the incriminating material available against the accused has been recovered and what remains is the mere confrontation of the accused, this court is of the view that the police remand of the accused is not warranted in the said case."

The judge, however, noted that in these testing times, a few miscreants in the society have resorted to vices like hoarding and black­marketing of essential drugs and medical equipment which could otherwise have averted so much death and destruction.

During a recent raid, 524 oxygen concentrators were recovered from Khan Chacha, Town Hall, and Nege & Ju restaurants owned by Kalra.

The absconding businessman was nabbed from Gurugram on May 16 night and formally arrested the next day.

During the proceedings, Additional Public Prosecutor Atul Shrivastava sought extension of the police custody of the accused on the grounds that two mobile phones have been recovered from the accused, their mirror images are yet to be prepared and he is yet to be interrogated.

The prosecutor said that during the police remand, the laptop was recovered from the accused which contained bills of the oxygen concentrators, details of the other transactions and these bills were yet to be segregated and the accused was required to be interrogated for the same.

However, senior advocate Vikas Pahwa, representing Kalra, opposed the remand application of the police on the grounds that all the recoveries have already been made and nothing remains that would require further custodial interrogation of his client.

During the earlier three-days of custodial interrogation, the police took Kalra to the three upscale restaurants owned by him in Khan Market and Lodhi Colony.

He was also taken for the mandatory medical examination.

The police claimed that the concentrators were imported from China and were being sold at an exorbitant price of Rs 50,000 to 70,000 a piece as against its cost of Rs 16,000 to Rs 22,000.

The concentrators are a crucial medical equipment used for COVID-19 patients and are on high demand amid the second wave of the pandemic.

On May 5, a case was registered against Kalra under Section 420 (cheating), 188 (disobedience to order promulgated by public servant), 120-B (criminal conspiracy) and 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code, Essential Commodities Act and Epidemic Diseases Act.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has also registered a money laundering case against him.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp