Former MLA sentenced to four months in jail for ignoring court summons
While giving Shokeen a jail term in an order passed on August 26, Special judge Geetanjli Goel said it was not a fit case for release on probation.
Published: 29th August 2023 08:37 AM | Last Updated: 29th August 2023 08:37 AM | A+A A-
Image used for representational purpose only.
NEW DELHI: A Delhi court sentenced former MLA Rambeer Shokeen to four months in jail for failing to appear before it despite repeated summons. The Delhi politician, who was declared a proclaimed offender after this, was an accused in a case related to the running of an organised crime syndicate in the Delhi-NCR region and registered under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). On August 23, he was acquitted of the charges under MCOCA.
While giving Shokeen a jail term in an order passed on August 26, Special Judge Geetanjli Goel said it was not a fit case for release on probation. ‘Considering the fact that the convict was earlier declared a proclaimed offender and was then arrested and had then again escaped from custody and was declared an absconder and surrendered only after considerable time had elapsed, the present is not a fit case to release the convict on probation,” the judge said.
“Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and to meet the ends of justice, it would be reasonable if the convict Rambler Shokeen is sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of four months,’ Goel added. The court, however, released him for the period he had already spent in jail. There is no other case pending against him, his lawyer said.
The prosecution had sought the maximum punishment of three years in the case, claiming that Shokeen was ‘highly placed and a Member of Legislative Assembly’ and should have acted more responsibly. He ought not to have indulged in criminal activities, it said and added that he should have honoured the law, which he did not do.
Advocates M S Khan and Qausar Khan, appearing for Shokeen, had sought minimum punishment for the accused, claiming that their client was falsely implicated in the present case. They added that he was a person of repute in society and won elections as an independent MLA and his wife had also won elections as a councillor.
