RTI Info Panel Feels Powerless as Respondents Ignore Orders

Reason is the loopholes in the Right To Information Act itself.

Published: 23rd June 2014 07:41 AM  |   Last Updated: 23rd June 2014 07:47 AM   |  A+A-


HYDERABAD: While the disposal of cases for information has improved at the State Information Commission, there seems to be not much difference in reality. While orders are passed after speedy hearing sessions, information commissioners say the respondents do not comply with the orders.

Reason is the loopholes in the Right To Information Act itself. Though the Commission enjoys a status on par with civil courts, it lacks powers to ensure compliance of its orders or contempt powers, rendering the institution toothless.

“There are several loopholes in the Act. In non-compliance of orders, we cannot act on our own. However, the petitioner can lodge a complaint following which we can hold a hearing and impose fine. But, again there is no system to ensure the fine is paid,” explains Jannat Hussain, chief information commissioner. He, however, claims that a majority of orders are implemented.

Stressing on the spirit of the Act which says “the one who seeks information should get it”, Rakesh Reddy Dubbudu, an RTI activist, points out that quantitative parameters like disposal rate do not reveal the real story.

“The commission should have powers to track and follow up cases. The present practice is that a case gets closed once the order is passed and not when the order is implemented,” says Dubbudu. Further, he notes that erring Public Information Officers (PIOs) tend to deliberately stay quiet and hesitate from providing the sought information.

State Information Commissioner Lam Thantiya Kumari had recently ordered an Alwal-based private educational institution to fall in line with the Act and divulge the sought information. Upon non-compliance by the management, the commissioner wrote to the UGC for withholding grants to the institution until the management honoured the order.

“There are loopholes in the act and in a majority of cases, the respondents approach the courts and get a stay order on the commission’s judgment, but we have to outsmart the erring respondents,” says Kumari.

Another information commissioner, on condition of anonymity, added, “In a judgment against an influential public school in the city, despite approaching the government for implementing, there is no progress and the school continues not to comply with the judgment.”


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp