Delayed FIR Not Reason Enough to Quash Case

The Hyderabad HC said that delay in lodging an FIR could not be a reason to quash proceedings in a case where there is prima facie evidence.

Published: 20th July 2015 07:41 AM  |   Last Updated: 20th July 2015 07:41 AM   |  A+A-

HYDERABAD: The Hyderabad High Court has made it clear that delay in lodging an FIR cannot be a reason to quash proceedings in a case where there is prima facie evidence.

Justice U Durga Prasad Rao made these observations on a petition filed by one Devender, in a criminal case, seeking to quash proceedings pending before the Sessions Judge in Warangal.

As per the prosecution, the victim - a minor girl - and accused number one and two were residents of the same locality in a village in Warangal district. The girl was an intermediate student as were both the accused. In fact, the prime accused was her distant relative too.

One day, the girl’s father was admitted to a hospital at Parkal for a leg surgery and her mother was also with him for assistance. The following day, the girl’s brother took meals to his parents leaving her alone at home. At that time, both the accused allegedly went to her house on the pretext of borrowing some notebooks and raped her. They stuffed her mouth with a cloth and threatened her with dire consequences if she revealed their heinous act.

Later, the shocked victim consumed a pesticide and informed her neighbours of the rape. They rushed her to a private nursing home for treatment. Later, she was shifted to a hospital in Hanamkonda where she was treated.

On the complaint of her father, the police investigated and filed a chargesheet against both the accused. Since A1 is a juvenile in conflict with law, a separate charge-sheet was filed against him before the Juvenile Magistrate-cum-IV Additional JFCM, Warangal.

After hearing the arguments, the judge said evidently, there was a delay of two days between the date of incident and lodging of FIR. “However, in a case of this nature, the delay is understandable... unless strong material is placed by the defence to show that the delay is used to manipulate events and implicate innocents,” he observed. Since no such strong ground is shown, delay can’t be taken as a reason to quash the proceedings, he ruled.

With regard to the argument of non-detection of semen, the judge opined that these contentions can best serve as a point of defence at the time of trial.

Stay up to date on all the latest Hyderabad news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp