STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Sentence under Sec 66A suspended

A judgment delivered by a local court invoking an already annulled Section 66 (A) of Information Technology Act, 2000 (punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service) by convi

Published: 20th April 2017 02:03 AM  |   Last Updated: 20th April 2017 05:57 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

HYDERABAD: A judgment delivered by a local court invoking an already annulled Section 66 (A) of Information Technology Act, 2000 (punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service) by convicting an accused was suspended by the Nampally court here on Wednesday. 


Express had reported in these columns about out the anomaly in the lower court’s verdict. A few weeks ago, the first additional chief metropolitan magistrate, Hyderabad, acting as in-charge magistrate for the court of sixth additional chief metropolitan magistrate, Hyderabad had convicted an accused of an offence under section 66A of IT Act and other offences though Section 66(A) had been struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015. 


The particular case was registered by CID’s cyber crime wing in 2010. After hearing the arguments of both counsels, the local court had convicted the accused under various sections, including Section 66 A of IT Act. 


Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi, counsel for the accused who challenged the local court’s judgment, said “After verifying the appeal petition, the court suspended the judgment till further orders.”


LAW BOOKS: Gopala Krishna filed a petition before the Supreme Court seeking a direction to law publications to print new books stating that 66A of IT Act was struck down and to local courts not to convict any accused under the section. 


“The local court judgment is in violation of Article 141 of Constitution and in violation of the order passed by the apex court by convicting the accused under Section 66(A), imposed one-year simple imprisonment and levied a fine of ` 5,000.  Section 66A of IT Act still appears in law books, particularly the 2017 edition of a book published by Gogia Law Agency, Hyderabad. 


It was nothing but an act of misguiding all the courts, whether trial or appellate courts of India,” Gopala Krishna said.  


In his PIL filed before the apex court, Gopala Krishna said the Union government  had not issued any notification or GO repealing Sec.66A of IT Act even two years after the Supreme Court struck it down on March 24, 2015. 


The inaction is highly violative of Article 19(1) and violation of Article 141 of the Constitution.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp