STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Scant evidence: Four in Hayathnagar hit & run case walk free

During their investigation, police found that the car’s occupants were all in a drunken condition and arrested all four of them including the driver.
 

Published: 14th November 2021 07:27 AM  |   Last Updated: 14th November 2021 07:27 AM   |  A+A-

Gavel, Court hammer, law

Representational image of a gavel.

Express News Service

HYDERABAD: A 2017 hit and run case of drunken driving which resulted in the death of a diploma student at Hayathnagar of Rachakonda commissionerate, ended in acquittal, as the court set free the person driving the car and three of his friends who were in the vehicle. They were all arrested on charges of culpable homicide and driving in a drunken condition. 

During the investigation, police proved that the accused purchased liquor from a wine shop, but failed to prove that the accused were in a drunken condition at the time of the incident. The wine shop owner testified in court that the accused purchased a liquor bottle from his shop, but he did not say that they had consumed it in his shop or nearby. 

“Therefore his evidence is not helpful to say that the accused were in a drunken condition at the relevant time (the time of the incident), “ the court stated in the verdict delivered a few days ago. The court also pointed out that, except for the basis of confession of the accused, no other evidence was placed with regard to drunken driving. 

Further, two other students who were eyewitnesses to the incident identified the accused in the car, without an identification parade. “Therefore, the developed theory of drunken driving by the police is nothing but conjecture and surmise. There is no evidence to show that the accused drove the car in a drunken state. At most, the act of the accused( driver) , if any, falls in the ambit of Section 304A of the IPC, but there is no substantive piece of evidence even for tagging him for the offence,” observed the court. The main accused had purchased a new car and had gone out with his friends for a drive. 

At Hayathnagar, the vehicle ran into the victims waiting at the bus stop, leaving one dead and another injured. During their investigation, police found that the car’s occupants were all in a drunken condition and arrested all four of them including the driver.

No proof that the driver was drunk
“The developed theory of drunken driving is nothing but conjecture and surmise. There is no evidence to show that the accused drove the car in a drunken state. At most, the act of the accused, if any, falls in the ambit of Section 304A, but there is no substantive piece of evidence to tag him for the offence,” the court observed



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp