STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Kerala's bar bribery case: Two many counsel spoil the scene

The government seems to have too much to say in the Bar bribery case involving former Finance Minister K M Mani!

Published: 09th March 2017 03:53 AM  |   Last Updated: 09th March 2017 03:53 AM   |  A+A-

Court Hammer

For representational purpose

By Express News Service

KOCHI: The government seems to have too much to say in the Bar bribery case involving former Finance Minister K M Mani!

That must be why two separate counsel turned up at the Kerala High Court on Wednesday. They presented separate statements too. The special prosecutor and a senior government pleader attached to the office of the Director General of Prosecutions (DGP) appeared on behalf of the prosecution.

The Court understandably did not take too kindly to this over-representation and slammed the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB). It has directed the investigating officer Sarish P R, Inspector, VACB, Thiruvananthapuram, who filed two statements through the two different agencies, to appear in front of it on March 27.

The court has also directed him to explain how he happened to file such statements.
“The investigating officer requires to be dealt with. This sort of irresponsible procedure cannot be allowed,” the court held.  

The HC made no bones about the fact that ‘such games’ cannot be allowed in  court.
“As an investigating officer, he must be honest, sincere and responsible. After having signed a statement on March 1, he should necessarily have informed the DGP about such a statement when he signed a second one on March 6,” the court said.

Two statements of objection were filed by the investigating officer: the first one through the special prosecutor and the other through Suman Chakravarthy, senior government pleader with DGP. The special prosecutor appointed by the state government told the court he was assigned to conduct the case. He made it clear he had no special interest in the case. “After the government issued the appointment order, the investigating officer had come to my office and held discussions. Based on this, I filed the statement,” the special prosecutor submitted.

Chakravarthy, on his part, submitted the DGP had granted consent to the government for appointing a special prosecutor to conduct the case at the Trial Court and not the High Court. A special public prosecutor can be appointed for conducting cases in the High Court only under Section 24 (1) of CrPC and that too after consultation with the High Court, it was submitted.

The Counsel for Mani submitted the statement of March 1 did not show it was a statement filed through the special prosecutor.

More from Kochi.

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp