Delhi HC judge recuses from hearing contempt proceeding pleas against 'Chhapaak' makers

Lawyer Aparna Bhat, who represented acid attack survivor Lakshmi during her legal battle, had approached Delhi High Court in the matter.

Published: 24th January 2020 12:57 PM  |   Last Updated: 25th January 2020 08:30 AM   |  A+A-

Actors Vikrant Massey and Deepika Padukone with 'Chhapaak' director Meghna Gulzar.

Actors Vikrant Massey and Deepika Padukone with 'Chhapaak' director Meghna Gulzar. (Photo | Twitter)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: A High Court judge stating that he had worked with the advocate who filed a plea seeking contempt proceedings against the makers of Deepika Padukone-starrer ‘Chhapaak’, recused himself from hearing the petition. 

Advocate Aparna Bhat who had represented acid attack survivor Laxmi Agarwal on whose life the movie is based had moved the petition. Bhat, in her plea, said the filmmakers had violated the high court’s January 11 direction to give her credit for the inputs she shared with them.

Justice A K Chawla said he and advocate Bhat had worked together when he was a lawyer and therefore, he would not be hearing the matter. He directed the registry to list the case before another bench for January 27.

Justice Prathiba M Singh had on January 11 directed the film’s director Meghna Gulzar and producer Fox Star Studios to acknowledge the advocate in the opening credits. The lawyer contended that the film was screened without complying with the direction and therefore, contempt of court proceeding be initiated against the makers of the film.

The January 11 order had come on a plea Fox Star Studios challenging a trial court’s order asking it to acknowledge the contribution of the advocate. The film was released on January 10.        

The high court had said that since the film has already been released, both internationally and in India, it should be ensured that there is no disruption in its screening. 

It was directed that the film will not be shown in theatres from January 15 without adding the credit line for the advocate to digital copies. In theatres where physical copies of the film were to be supplied by the producer, the changes had to be carried out with effect from January 18, it had said. The producer’s advocate had said the trial court did not hear them before passing an order and an ad-interim ex-parte injunction was passed which is unusual.      

No credit for victim’s advocate? 

Advocate Bhat, in her plea before the trial court, had said that despite representing Laxmi in courts for several years and helping in the making of the film, she was not given credit in the movie. She had said the filmmakers took her help in the entire process of writing and shooting the movie, but did not give her credit. 

(With PTI inputs)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp