AG backs Presidential reference on 2G in SC

Published: 13th July 2012 10:54 AM  |   Last Updated: 13th July 2012 10:54 AM   |  A+A-

Attorney General Goolam Vahanvati, during his arguments in the Supreme Court on Thursday, countered the arguments that the apex court should not entertain the Presidential Reference on 2G spectrum judgment.

Vahanvati told a five-judge Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadia, Justice D K Jain, Justice J S Kehar, Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Ranjan Gogoi that various grounds had been made in support of the contention that the present reference is not maintainable and that it should not be answered.

On the argument that the Reference should be rejected because it does not spell out a doubt, Vahanvati said “this approach is wrong”. It is contrary to the plain reading of Article 143 (1) of the Constitution (Power of President to consult Supreme Court), he argued. The very fact that a question has been referred shows that there is a doubt on which opinion of the Supreme Court was sought and on which the apex court may render a report.

Therefore, merely because the Reference does not use the word ‘doubt’ in the recitals, it does not follow that in substance no doubt has arisen on which the opinion of the court is necessitated, the AG submitted.

The recitals in the Reference show that certain questions of law of far reaching national and international implications had arisen, Vahanvati said. These impact the investment through the FDI in the country not only in telecom, but in other sectors. These questions of law have far reaching consequences for the development of the country, the AG stated.

CJI Flays  Media  

In the morning, Chief Justice Kapadia said that the media reports on Thursday with regard to the court proceedings on the issue indicated as if the apex court had decided to reject the reference.

“The court has not yet made up its mind on answering the reference or returning it. We have an open mind. Merely because we are asking questions, one cannot jump to any conclusions,” Kapadia said.

“It is for this reason that the apex court wanted media guidelines,” he said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp