Indira was Unaware of Constitutional Provisions of Emergency: Pranab

President penned his thoughts about the tumultuous period in India\'s post-independence history in his book that has just been released.

Published: 11th December 2014 04:11 PM  |   Last Updated: 11th December 2014 07:23 PM   |  A+A-


Vice President Hamid Ansari greets President Pranab Mukherjee on his birthday at the Rashtrapati Bhawan in New Delhi on Thursday | PTI


NEW DELHI: The 1975 Emergency was perhaps an "avoidable event" and Congress and Indira Gandhi had to pay a heavy price for this "misadventure" as suspension of fundamental rights and political activity, large scale arrests and press censorship adversely affected people, says President Pranab Mukherjee.   

A junior minister under Gandhi in those turbulent times, Mukherjee however, is also unsparing of the opposition then under the leadership of the late Jayaprakash Narayan, JP, whose movement appeared to him to be "directionless".           

The President has penned his thoughts about the tumultuous period in India's post-independence history in his book "The Dramatic Decade: the Indira Gandhi Years" that has just been released.        

He discloses that Indira Gandhi was not aware of the Constitutional provisions allowing for declaration of Emergency that was imposed in 1975 and it was Siddartha Shankar Ray who led her into the decision.       

Ironically, it was Ray, then Chief Minister of West Bengal, who also took a sharp about-turn on the authorship of the Emergency before the Shah Commission that went into 'excesses' during that period and disowned that decision, according to Mukherjee.

Mukherjee, who celebrated his 79th birthday today, says,"The Dramatic Decade is the first of a trilogy; this book covers the period between 1969 and 1980...I intent to deal with the period between 1980 and 1998 in volume II, and the period between 1998 and 2012, which marked the end of my active political career, in volume III."          

"At this point in the book, it will be sufficient to say here that many of us who were part of the Union Cabinet at that time (I was a junior minister) did not then understand its deep and far reaching impact." Mukherjee's 321-page book covers various chapters including the liberation of Bangladesh, JP's offensive, the defeat in the 1977 elections, split in Congress and return to power in 1980 and after.     

The President says there was no doubt that Emergency brought discipline in public life, a growing economy, controlled inflation, a reversed trade deficit for the first time, enhanced developmental expenditure and a crack down on tax evasion and smuggling but "it was perhaps an avoidable event".            

"Suspension of fundamental rights and political activity (including trade union activity), large scale arrests of political leaders and activists, press censorship, and extending the life of legislatures by not conducting elections were some instances of Emergency adversely affecting the interests of the people. The Congress and Indira Gandhi had to pay a heavy price for this misadventure," says Mukherjee.    

Recounting the dramatic moments leading to declaration of Emergency minutes before midnight of June 25, 1975, he says that it was the suggestion of Ray, then Chief Minister of West Bengal, and Indira Gandhi acted on it.

"Indira Gandhi told me subsequently that she was not even aware of the Constitutional provisions allowing for the declaration of a state of Emergency on grounds of internal disturbance particularly since a state of Emergency had already been proclaimed as a consequence of Indo-Pak conflict in 1971", he says.  

Ray, then member of CWC and Central Parliamentary Board, was one of the "most influential advisors" of Indira Gandhi with his views being sought on diverse issues.     

"Siddhartha Babu had considerable influence over the decision making process of the organisation and administration...In matters relating to West Bengal, he was the decisive voice. So it was not surprising that he was privy to considerable information...," the President said.

Interestingly, though not surprisingly, once it was declared, there were a whole host of people claiming authorship of idea of declaring the Emergency.

And, again not surprisingly, these very people took a sharp about-turn before the Shah Commission.

"Not only did they disown their involvement, they pinned all the blame on Indira Gandhi pleading their own innocence. Siddartha babu was no exception. Deposing before the Shah Commission, he ran into Indira Gandhi--draped in a crimson sari that day--in the Commission hall and tossed a sprightly remark: 'You look pretty today'.

'Despite your efforts,' retorted a curt Indira Gandhi.

Terming the Shah Commission proceedings as "peculiar", Mukherjee said,"Suffice it to say that it seemed that the Commission was collecting materials and information only to substantiate a pre-conceived conclusion."

Mukherjee recalled that a number of ministers and bureaucrats deposed before the Commission blaming Indira Gandhi "alone" for the imposition of the Emergency with the Cabinet not being taken into confidence.

Giving details of the testimony of the then Home Minister Kasu Bramhananda Reddy before the Commission, the President said Reddy told the panel that he was called by the Prime Minister at 10.30 PM and was told that on account of deteriorating law and order situation, it was necessary to impose an internal Emergency.

According to Reddy, he told the Prime Minister that the powers already available under the existing Emergency could be availed of to deal with the situation but was overruled by Indira Gandhi saying internal Emergency was "considered necessary."

"Bramhananda Reddy told the Commission that he then signed a letter to the President of the Republic and appended the draft proclamation of Emergency for the President's assent with this letter. The Letter signed by Brahmananda Reddy was on a plain sheet of paper and not on the letter head of the Home Minister of India," he said.

Referring to "Jayaprakash Narayan's offensive", the President recalls that a day after the Allahabad High Court judgement unseating Indira Gandhi from Lok Sabha membership, JP had thundered from Patna against Gandhi's "failure" to bow to the High Court verdict and resign.       

The opposition leaders also sat on dharna outside Rashtrapati Bhavan demanding resignation which went on for three days until the President returned from a trip in Kashmir, he says.          While the Congress party and its MPs rallied behind Gandhi, the opposition was determined "not to lose this opportunity".            

Justice V R Krishna Iyer of Supreme Court had given a conditional stay on the judgement of the Allahabad High Court judgement.           

The opposition parties could have decided to wait for the final judgement of the Supreme Court which unanimously upheld the election from Rai Bareli. They did not even wait for the expiry of the period of the absolute stay of 20 days granted by the High Court and the conditional stay of Justice Iyer.           

"Battle lines were drawn and both sides were geared up. On June 25, 1975 JP addressed a massive rally at Ramlila Maidan, Delhi, at which he announced a programme of civil disobedience," Mukherjee says.  

JP repeated his exhortation to the police and the army to disobey 'illegal' orders, challenging Indira Gandhi to bring charges against him if she thought he was preaching treason.   

He also asked the students to walk out of classrooms and into jails and suggested that Chief Justice of India A N Ray that it would not be in his personal interest to sit in the Bench which would hear Indira Gandhi's appeal as he was obliged to her for his appointment.        

JP's histrionics clearly highlighted that opposition's sole aim was to get Indira Gandhi to resign--wanting her out even before the final decision of the Supreme Court.           

"Restoration of the rule of law was then clearly not the issue, as it still prevailed in the country. The Prime Minister was entitled to continue in the office and she did so according to the law of the land. By behaving in this manner, the opposition was denying the Prime Minister the legal rights available to ordinary citizens of India." Mukherjee contends that Supreme Court permitted Gandhi to continue as Prime Minister and how could the opposition replace her when an overwhelming majority of Congress MPs backed her.     

"How does the issue of morality at all arise when allegations causing Indira Gandhi to lose the Allahabad election suit were of a technical nature and no charges of moral turpitude could be established against her?," asks the President.

A closer analysis of the situation provides the answer, the President says adding without a doubt, JP was spearheading the strategy of the opposition.        

The fact that opposition parties accepted his leadership and joined his total revolution movement had little to do with ideological conviction. With no one among them to measure upto Indira Gandhi's political charisma, they needed a moral authority to provide them strength. And who better than JP at this time?, says the President.

Though Mukherjee found JP to be far above petty political games and wanted to restore moral values in Indian politics who did not clamour for power or office, he could not support the movement.     

"To me it appeared to be directionless. It was contradictory in that it was a movement fighting against corruption yet composed of people and parties whose integrity was not above board," writes Mukherjee.            

The opposition movement went on even after the arrest of a large number of political leaders and workers. Though the Press was censored during the Emergency hesitations, doubts and strident criticism were voiced through variety of other channels.        

"The Emergency was a crucial phase in our parliamentary democracy. The declaration, its operation and, finally, its withdrawal had a profound impact on India's political structure as I have mentioned earlier. Those who had been sceptical of a parliamentary democracy succeeding in India became gleeful at the thought that they had been proven correct.      

"Those who had bought into the idea of democracy and were enchanted by the Constitution of India and the successful execution of electoral democracy since 1952 were rudely shocked,"            he says.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp