SC Notice to Ex-Sc Judge on Plea to Transfer Defamation Suit

Published: 21st July 2014 04:43 PM  |   Last Updated: 21st July 2014 04:43 PM   |  A+A-


NEW DELHI: Supreme Court today issued notice to its former judge and the current Chairman of National Green Tribunal Swatanter Kumar on a plea filed by an intern, who had levelled sexual harassment allegations against him, seeking transfer of his defamation suit against her from Delhi High Court.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice R M Lodha asked Swatanter Kumar to respond within four weeks on the intern's plea who expressed apprehensions of not getting justice in Delhi citing the "influence" and high position enjoyed by Kumar in the bar and bench.

Referring to Swatanter Kumar's tenure as a judge in the Delhi High Court, senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for the intern, submitted that when a judge becomes litigant in the same court, the matter must be heard in another court.

Jaising submitted the matter be heard in the Karnataka High Court as the intern resides there.

The bench after hearing her contentions said, "We will have to go by the likelihood of the girl's apprehensions. Not only must Justice be done, it must also be seen to be done."

The bench then asked senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for Kumar, to file response within four weeks.

It refused to pass any interim order regarding high court proceedings after Venugopal told the bench that he will seek adjournment in the case (before HC) in view of the transfer petition of the intern pending in the Supreme Court.

Justice Kumar, in his reply to the allegations leveled by the intern, had earlier said the charges against him were part of a malicious conspiracy intended to damage his reputation.

A defamation suit was filed by Justice Swatanter Kumar in the Delhi High Court against the woman intern and some media houses for allegations of sexual harassment made against him.

Justice Kumar had also demanded Rs five crore as damages from the woman lawyer and three media groups that publicized her complaint.

The high court had on March 22, said some media houses "deliberately" published and telecast allegations against Kumar despite its order barring the same.

The High Court had also warned that if it felt the court's order was not being complied with appropriate action would be taken against those responsible.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp