STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Subrata to Remain in Jail

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld its order to detain Sahara Group chief Subrata Roy, while rejecting his contention that the rules of natural justice were not followed in the case.

Published: 07th May 2014 01:06 PM  |   Last Updated: 07th May 2014 01:06 PM   |  A+A-

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld its order to detain Sahara Group chief Subrata Roy, while rejecting his contention that the rules of natural justice were not followed in the case.

“Disobedience of orders of a court strikes at the very root of the rule of law, on which the judicial system rests. Judicial orders are bound to be obeyed at all costs. Howsoever grave the effect may be, is no answer for non-compliance of a judicial order.”

“Judicial orders cannot be permitted to be circumvented. In exercise of contempt jurisdiction, courts have the power to enforce compliance of judicial orders, and also, the power to punish for contempt,” the apex court said in its 207-page order.

A Bench of Justices K S Radhakrishnan and J S Khehar also came down heavily on Sahara for systematically frustrating and flouting all its orders with impunity on refunding the investors’ money. It said the group had “adopted a demeanour of defiance constituting a rebellious behaviour, not amenable to the rule of law” and justified its decision to send Roy along with two promoters of the company to jail.

And Roy’s plea seeking the Bench’s recusal from hearing the case was rapped by the court.

“We find no merit in the contention advanced on behalf of the petitioner, that we should recuse ourselves from hearing this case. Calculated psychological offensives and mind games adopted to seek recusal of judges, need to be strongly repulsed.”

“We deprecate such tactics and recommend a similar approach to other Courts, when they experience such behaviour,” it said.

According to the Bench, the two companies of which Roy was a promoter had “flouted” various orders passed by the SEBI, SAT, the High Court and the apex Court with impunity, which could not be allowed.

It held that the various proposals made by Roy and the group on depositing money turned out to be “ploys to sidetrack and derail the process of law”. The judges also brushed aside the contentions of the group that money had already been substantially refunded to the investors, saying it had rejected the stand earlier and hence the contention was untenable. The court also took a dig at Sahara and observed that judges would need to be superhumans to handle the pressures to handle frivolous litigation.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp