Will Not File Closure Reports in Coal Block Scam, Says CBI

The CBI informed the Supreme Court on Thursday that it will not file closure reports on its own in the coal block allocation scam.

Published: 09th May 2014 07:48 AM  |   Last Updated: 09th May 2014 07:48 AM   |  A+A-

The CBI informed the Supreme Court on Thursday that it will not file closure reports on its own in the coal block allocation scam.

Taking into account the CBI’s oral submission, a Bench headed by Chief Justice R M Lodha, said, “It is now understood that they (CBI) will not file the closure report.”

The CBI was accused by Common Cause, an NGO, of unfair probe into the scam, and that there were instances when the agency filed closure reports in regular cases without seeking the opinion of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). The Bench also took note of cases where senior officials of the CBI had overruled the investigating officers, after filing the regular cases and chargesheets. It directed the CBI to place files relating to all preliminary enquires before the CVC.

According to CBI sources, the agency had no issues if the CVC looked into the closed cases. However, it should not be the last deciding factor. The CBI contended that in regular cases, it couldn’t take the opinion of the CVC, as it would be contrary to the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which makes it mandatory for the probe agency to file charge sheets in competent courts.

The court, which posted July 8 as the next date of hearing, also asked the CBI and Enforcement Directorate to place before it by July 7, the status report on probe till June 30. The court made it clear that its clearance to the CBI Director to accept the recusal of its Joint Director O P Galhotra from all coalgate cases, “should not be treated that adverse observations have been made against him.”

“Since O P Galhotra, the Joint Director has sought to recuse himself from cases of coal block allocation, and his request has been accepted by the CBI Director. Nothing further needs to be said. By accepting the recusal of Galhotra, it is made clear that it should not be treated as an adverse comment relating to his professional commitment,” the Bench noted.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp