SC Declines Urgent Hearing of Plea for Quashing of NJAC Act

SC declines a plea seeking quashing of NJAC Act which ends the age old system of Judges themselves selecting, appointing higher judiciary.

Published: 06th January 2015 12:47 PM  |   Last Updated: 06th January 2015 12:47 PM   |  A+A-

supreme court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today declined urgent hearing of a plea seeking quashing of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act which ends the two-decade-old collegium system of judges themselves selecting and appointing judges for higher judiciary.

"There is no urgency. This will come in the usual course," a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice H L Dattu said, when senior advocate Bhim Singh mentioned the matter and sought an urgent hearing.

The petition filed in the Supreme Court yesterday challenging the legality and constitutional validity of the NJAC Act, 2014 and the Constitution (121st Amendment) Bill, 2014, came barely a week after President Pranab Mukherjee accorded assent to them.

The plea filed by Singh, who is also the chief of Jammu and Kashmir National Panthers Party, termed them as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

It contended that the new system will result in excessive dominance of the executive in appointment of judges to the superior judiciary and recommendation of the Chief Justice of India would be reduced to mere suggestion.

The plea said the new process is likely to jeopardise the appointment of judges in higher courts resulting in further delay in rendering justice to the common people.

The senior advocate challenged the legality and constitutional validity of the NJAC Act saying that it is violative of Articles 14 and 21 and other provisions of the Constitution and the foundation for the principle of judicial independence.

The petition said that on December 31, 2014, President of India has given his assent to two bills including, the NJAC Bill, 2014 and the constitution (121 Amendment) Bill, 2014 and "the aforesaid two Acts have caused excessive dominance of the executive in the matter of appointment of judges to the superior judiciary as well as in the formation of its structural composition discarding the opinion of Chief Justice of India."


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp