Top Supreme Court Bench Begins Hearing on Remission

The issue arose after Tamil Nadu decided to remit sentences and set free seven convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

Published: 16th July 2015 04:41 AM  |   Last Updated: 16th July 2015 07:23 AM   |  A+A-

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday deferred to July 21 the hearing on the issue of power of remission by the Centre and States to release convicts. The issue arose after Tamil Nadu government decided to remit sentences and set free seven convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

When a five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice H L Dattu, began the hearing on Wednesday, the Centre submitted that the issue would require extensive hearing for three to four days.

To this, the bench informed Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, representing the Centre, that it was sitting for only a day in the present combination and adjourned the hearing to July 21.

Top SC Bench.jpgOn that day, the bench would also examine whether State governments have the power of remission in a prosecution launched by central agencies like the CBI.

Appearing for V Sriharan alias Murugan, one of the convicts in the Rajiv case, senior advocate Ram Jethmalani opposed the Centre’s submission saying the matter did not require that much time.

In his written submission, Jethmalani said citizens could file writ petitions for enforcement of their fundamental rights and the “Union of India is not a citizen but State under Article 12; it has no such rights vested in it”.

“The present petition is not maintainable for the additional reason that it seeks to challenge the correctness of a final judgement of this court through a writ petition under Article 32,” Jethmalani contended.

“It is well settled in law that a judgement of this court cannot be challenged by way of a petition under Article 32. The only remedy is by way of a Review or Curative petition,” he said adding, “the stay obtained in respect of remissions all over the country (not confined to the present convicts) continues unlawfully even today.”

Subsequently, the court stayed the release of four other convicts in the case, Nalini, Robert Pious, Jayakumar, and Ravichandran, saying there were procedural lapses on part of the State government.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp