'How Will New Judicial Panel Improve Court Functioning?'
NEW DELHI:The Supreme Court on Friday asked how the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) mechanism would make judicial functioning meaningful and in what way would its members be accountable and to whom. A constitution Bench of Justice J S Khehar posed the questions in reference to the statement of objects and reasons given in the NJAC Act, 2014.
The act reads, “The said commission would provide a meaningful role for the judiciary, the executive and eminent persons to present their view points and make the participants accountable, while also introducing transparency in the selection process.”
“What meaningful role there are talking about? How can they make participants accountable?” Justice Khehar asked senior counsel Rajeev Dhavan, who appeared as intervener in NJAC hearing.
Dhavan asked how two politicians, with the CJI sandwiched between them, would decide on two laymen interfering in the judicial appointments.
Dhavan said that once they were appointed, they would be nailed down in NJAC for three years. “The independence of judiciary and its preponderance could not be permitted to be diluted as it was the custodian of Constitution and balanced the rights of the people which they have surrendered to the political executive under the Constitution,” he said.
Lawyer gets show cause
New Delhi: The SC issued a show cause notice to advocate M L Sharma for making irresponsible and scandalous allegations in his PIL challenging the new law on appointment of judges for higher judiciary, saying this is not a political platform.
Two Defamation Cases Against Kejriwal Stayed
New Delhi: The SC stayed proceedings in trial courts in two criminal defamation cases against Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal and decided to hear them along with the pleas in which the constitutional validity of the penal provisions have been challenged. “Once we have directed stay in other cases, it will follow in other cases also,” the bench said while issuing notice to Centre.
Tech mahindra moves court in satyam scam
New Delhi: Tech Mahindra Ltd, formerly Satyam Computer Services Ltd, moved the SC in connection with the Enforcement Directorate’s proceedings in the Satyam scam. The company appealed against an order of the AP High Court, which had allowed a special court hearing criminal cases arising out of the Satyam scam to frame charges against Tech Mahindra.