Hit-and-Run Case: Hearing of Salman's Appeal Delayed

The Bombay High Court rejected the `paper-book\' in 2002 hit-and-run-case, in which Bollywood actor Salman Khan has been convicted, saying it doesn\'t conform to rules and should be prepared anew by September 11.

Published: 07th September 2015 07:06 PM  |   Last Updated: 07th September 2015 07:06 PM   |  A+A-

By PTI

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court today rejected the `paper-book' in 2002 hit-and-run-case, in which Bollywood actor Salman Khan has been convicted, saying it doesn't conform to rules and should be prepared anew by September 11.

Paper-book is compilation of evidence, documents and the the lower court's orders/verdict, prepared by the HC registry and submitted to both the sides before the appeal is heard.

The HC is hearing an appeal filed by Salman against the five-year sentence awarded on May 6 by the sessions court for ramming his car into a bakery, killing one person and injuring four others, in suburban Bandra on September 28, 2002.

Last month, the court had asked the registry to prepare a fresh paper-book by adding some documents which Salman's lawyer, Amit Desai, said were "missing".

The revised paper-book was submitted today but advocate Desai said it was still not in keeping with the HC manual.

The charge-sheet was included when it is not needed, he said. "The charges are to be listed but here the charge sheet has been added....the (present) paper-book is a prejudicial material, it is in conflict with law, conflict with manual," he said.

Justice A R Joshi then ordered the HC registry to prepare the paper-book again, strictly complying with rules as the appeal cannot be heard without completing this exercise.

Among other things, the paper-book did not have a document pertaining to a media interview given by Ravindra Patil, a policeman who was then Salman's bodyguard and eye- witness to the accident. Patil, who died during the trial, had contradicted in the interview his own statement before the magistrate, the application by Salman's lawyer says.

It is a very vital document for the defence to prove that Patil was not telling the truth, it says. Patil had told the magistrate that Salman was driving the car and was drunk.

The actor, who is on bail, did not come to the court today. His sister Alvira was present.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp