Ishrat Jahan Case: Chidambaram Should Stop Evading Questions, Says BJP

Chidambaram alleged that the affidavit controversy related to the Ishrat case was only an attempt to divert attention.

Published: 26th April 2016 01:26 PM  |   Last Updated: 26th April 2016 01:26 PM   |  A+A-

By ANI

NEW DELHI: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday fired a fresh salvo at former home minister P. Chidambaram over the alleged changes that he made in the affidavits of the Ishrat Jahan case and dared the former not to evade questions and respond to the queries raised in this regard.

Union Telecom Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad told ANI that Chidambaram, because of extraneous political conditions, had sought a compromise in a matter that had national security implications.

“The crucial issue is that why Mr. Chidambaram evading, namely, why did he order a change in the affidavit when the process is sought to compromise national security. In the first affidavit in case of Ishrat Jahan it was clearly stated it was a LeT operations terror model including of Pakistan and therefore right action was taken,” said Prasad.

“In the second affidavit Chidambaram by passes the Home Secretary all other officers and orders if the government of India has no objection for a CBI enquiry and in the process purely because of extraneous political conditions the entire security establishment was sought to be compromised that is the real issue. I would ask Mr. Chidambaram to respond to these burning questions which are very relevant,” he added.

Chidambaram yesterday alleged that the affidavit controversy related to the Ishrat Jahan encounter case was only an attempt to divert attention from the real issue.

"Real issue is whether there was fake a encounter & whether FOUR people already in custody were KILLED in that FAKE ENCOUNTER. Coming to the affidavits, the Home Minister does not sign affidavits. It is signed by an Under Secretary," he said in a series of tweets.

"Although I have no recollection of seeing the first affidavit, let us presume that I did. Then came the report of Magistrate SP Tamang. This report caused uproar and there was demand mainly from Gujarat that Government of India should clarify or dispel misinterpretation being placed on the first affidavit. This is why a Second, short affidavit was filed!" he added.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp