Details of Mallya, Family's Assets Must be Disclosed: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed liquor baron Vijay Mallya to disclose all his assets and those of his family in India and abroad to a consortium of banks

Published: 27th April 2016 06:49 AM  |   Last Updated: 27th April 2016 06:49 AM   |  A+A-

Mallya PTI

Vijay Mallya. | PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed liquor baron Vijay Mallya to disclose all his assets and those of his family in India and abroad to a consortium of banks. The setback to the business tycoon came just a day after the Ethics Committee of the Rajya Sabha had recommended his expulsion from the House. A bench, comprising Justices Kurian Joseph and R F Nariman, ruled, “We don’t find any tangible objection in disclosing the assets (of Mallya, his wife and children) to banks.” It directed the apex court registry to furnish to the banks, details of assets, both domestic and foreign, submitted by Mallya in a sealed cover to the court.

The bench took exception to Mallya’s non-compliance of its April 7 order and said, “The whole purpose of asking for disclosure was to give a fair idea to the banks for entering into a meaningful and viable settlement.” It also asked the Debt Recovery Tribunal to expeditiously decide within two months, the pleas of banks and financial institutions for recovery of their loans. During the hearing, the bench questioned senior advocates CS Vaidyanathan and Parag Tripathi, appearing for Mallya, about his presence in India. Vaidyanathan replied, “I have no instruction on this. In spite of all investigation since July 2015, not a shred of evidence was found (against Mallya) of misuse or diversion of funds secured as loan... the only purpose of insisting on his return was to see him in Tihar jail.” He contended that asking for details of overseas assets of Mallya and his family was in violation of right to privacy.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said despite revocation of Mallya’s passport, if the fugitive businessman shows willingness to return, a one-way travel permit could be arranged. “He is a fugitive from justice in India,” the AG said, adding the businessman was playing hide and seek. Rohatgi further submitted that Mallya was “deliberately concealing something from the court” as he had “no intention to come back”. However, Mallya’s lawyer said he was a defaulter but not a wilful defaulter. He explained that the accumulated loans of Kingfisher Airlines stood at `16,000 crore in 2013.

SC Raps Centre over bad loans

The Supreme Court pulled up the Centre for not having a mechanism for recovering the defaulted loans by PSU banks. “There is also a need of amendments. Suggest the ways and means by which these things can be prevented,” it said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp