STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Opposition Slams Centre Over Mallya, Government Says Will Act

During Zero Hour in the Lok Sabha, Jaitley said Mallya, as of the end of November 2015, owed about Rs.90 billion to various banks in the country.

Published: 10th March 2016 11:33 PM  |   Last Updated: 10th March 2016 11:39 PM   |  A+A-

NEW DELHI: Even as the government on Thursday assured that "every possible action will be taken" against beleaguered liquor baron Vijay Mallya, the Congress hit out at the Centre asking "how did it allow Mallya to leave the country".

Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi on Thursday questioned the government as to how it allowed liquor baron Vijay Mallya to leave the country.

"I asked a clear question to Jaitley-ji, How did Mallya-ji escape from India? Someone who has stolen Rs.9,000 crore from the government, how did you allow him to leave the country," Gandhi asked.

The issue was also raised in the Rajya Sabha by Leader of Oposition Ghulam Nabi Azad of the Congress, who said Mallya should not have been allowed to leave as there were serious charges against him.

"He could have been identified even at the airport when he was leaving as he is a prominent figure and most people recognise him," Azad said.

SBI Blames Holidays for Delay in Moving Courts Against Mallya

Full Force of Law Will Be Applied Against Defaulters: Sinha

Banks Should Have Acted Earlier to Stop Mallya: Finance Minister 

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley invoked the case of Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi while countering Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi's allegation that the government had failed to act against Mallya.

Quattrocchi was an Italian businessman who was sought until 2009 in India for criminal charges of acting as a conduit for bribes in the Bofors scandal.

Countering Rahul Gandhi's allegation, Jaitley later told reporters: "Rahul Gandhi should understand that going away of Ottavio Quattrocchi and Vijay Mallya is not the same. When CBI had alerted government about Quattrocchi, it was a criminal case and the then government did not stop him."

Jaitley also added that there is a legal procedure on impounding a passport and action could be taken only based on the provisions of the Passport Act.

During Zero Hour in the Lok Sabha, Jaitley said Mallya, as of the end of November 2015, owed about Rs.90 billion to various banks in the country.

He was responding to the issue raised by Congress floor leader Mallikarjun Kharge, who wanted to know why the government did not "confiscate" the passport of the chief of the now defunct Kingfisher Airlines.

The Congress leader wanted to know why the government and State Bank of India did not act against Mallya in time, which helped him to flee.

Jaitley said every member of the house shares the concern raised by Kharge, but said the sanction of money to Mallya was made during the UPA regime.

“The banks have started taking action against the companies to recover the debt. Certainly every possible action will be taken against all the defaulters,” Jaitley said in the Lok Sabha.

“Some cases were filed in different courts across the country and some counter-cases were also registered,” he added.

Jaitley also said that as of November 30, 2015, the total dues compounded with interest stands to the tune of over Rs.9,000 crore against Vijay Mallya’s companies.

"As far as accounts are concerned, first sanction was made by the consortium of banks in September 2004," and then again in 2008. "These dates speak for themselves," he said.

Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Rajiv Pratap Rudy said Mallya was "no saint" for the NDA regime.

Dissatisfied with Jaitley's reply over Mallya leaving the country, the Congress and the Left parties staged a walkout.

Meanwhile, the biggest public sector lender State Bank of India denied any laxity on the part of the consortium of banks in seeking reliefs against the defunct Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. (KFAL), its promoters and holding-associated company.

It also refuted certain media reports (Not the IANS) purportedly blaming the SBI, the leader of the consortium, for the crisis and termed these as based on "hearsay and conjecture".



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp