Rawalpindi Slams Its Ruler-Generals, Lauds Indian Babus

Soon after Independence, politicians began to view the military with suspicion as the last supporters of the British Raj

Published: 27th March 2016 06:06 AM  |   Last Updated: 27th March 2016 06:06 AM   |  A+A-

NEW DELHI: The much-mali­gned Indian bureaucr­acy got a pat on its back from its rival, the Pakistan Army, which called its own babus and generals “shady” and “inconsistent”. In its top-secret Green Book, the Pakistan Army slams its generals-turned-rulers by calling Ayub Khan a ‘laissez-faire leader’, Yahya Khan an ‘impoverished leader’ and Pervez Musharraf a general who couldn’t go beyond autocratic rule.

The Green Book says that in India, “bureaucratic stream supports the executive... In India, a combination of intellectuals, businessmen and hereditary leadership rules the masses. The democratic system has evolved and matured rapidly. Soon after Independence in 1947, politicians began to view the military with suspicion as the last supporters of the British Raj, so not only kept it isolated from influencing decisions and policies, but also fully subordinated to political leadership and bureaucracy.”

While defining its own bureaucracy, the book says ‘it is shady’, its leadership attribute is ‘inconsistent’ and executive power is ‘vacillating’. It complimented the Indian leadership development, saying “it has been systematic” while in Pakistan, “it is informal with weak civil control”. Interestingly, the Green Book notes that “bureaucratic leadership has played a partisan role instead of standing up for principles”.

“Mistrust between the three streams — political, bureaucratic and military — has never been addressed by Pakistan. It affects the desired harmonise­d efforts at the top tier,” it says.

“The political structure of Pakistan could not take roots... Where political leadership was unable to charter a course for themselves, a more organised and trained military bureaucracy started filling in the gaps. This was by no means a sound arrangement but a need of the hour nevertheless,” it says. There is no love lost between the political establishment and army. The Book calls the political system immature, noting that the “political leadership has not been able to develop as other streams. Reason for the shortcomings has been the absence in the present political framework of...a system of checks and balances on the leadership”.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp