We will revoke President's rule in Uttarakhand, Centre tells SC

Centre informed SC that the President\'s Rule will be revoked from the Uttarakhand soon.

Published: 11th May 2016 12:20 PM  |   Last Updated: 11th May 2016 07:06 PM   |  A+A-

Harish Rawat PTI

Former Chief Minister Harish Rawat after the end of crucial Uttarakhand Assembly floor test at party office in Dehradun on Tuesday. | PTI


NEW DELHI: The central government on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that ousted Uttarakhand Chief Minister Harish Rawat had the legislative majority and his government would be restored as soon as President's Rule was revoked in the hill state.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi informed the court that Rawat got 33 votes in his favour while as 28 legislators voted against him in the floor test held on Tuesday.

Rawat aces floor test, returns as Uttarakhand CM a hero 

He said the central government, which dismissed the Rawat-led Congress government on March 27 citing misgovernance, would withdraw President's Rule on Wednesday.

"I am requesting we may be granted leave to revoke President's Rule and thereafter Harish Rawat's government will be restored," Rohatgi told the court. 

The attorney general said: "I have advised the government to take this course."

As Rohatgi informed the Supreme Court of the floor test result, the bench, comprising Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Shiva Kirti Singh, modified its April 22 order. The judges had had on that day taken an undertaking from Rohatgi that President's Rule won't be revoked so long the top court was seized of the matter.

The court asked the central government to inform it by Thursday of its action on withdrawing President's Rule. The next hearing of the matter has been listed for Friday.

The court, however, said it would hold hearing sometime in September on the central government's plea challenging the Uttarakhand High Court order that quashed the President's Rule on April 21. The then Uttarakhand Chief Justice K. M. Joseph had lashed out at the central government for acting like a "private party" and dismissing the state government by invoking Article 356.

The court said it was necessary to examine justifiability of the imposition of the President's Rule as the same had been quashed by the high court citing several reasons.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp