STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

No interim stay on Karnataka High Court order against tobacco picture warnings: Supreme Court

Directing the next hearing of the matter on January 8, the court asked the High Court to upload the judgment by then.

Published: 22nd December 2017 04:19 PM  |   Last Updated: 22nd December 2017 05:51 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court of India (Photo | PTI)

By IANS

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday declined an interim stay of the Karnataka High Court order setting aside the 2014 Rules mandating that 85 per cent space on both the sides of a packet of cigarettes or other tobacco products carry pictorial warning on their harmful effects.

The bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul declined the state, noting that the December 15 High Court judgment was not available as it has not been uploaded on the High Court website so far.

The court however, said that those engaged in tobacco manufacturing and industry would not later claim any equity on account of it not staying the operation of the High Court order.

Directing the next hearing of the matter on January 8, the court asked the High Court to upload the judgment by then.

The Centre has in 2014 amended the Cigarette and other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules prescribing that 85 per cent space on the both sides of the tobacco packaging would be covered with the statutory warnings telling consumers that cigarette smoking and tobacco chewing was harmful to health.

The 2014 amended Rules came into force from April 1, 2016.

The Cigarette and other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Amendments Rules, 2014 were framed under the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003.

Prior to 2014 amendment of the Rules, the pictorial warning was limited to the 40% space of the packaging and that too to one side only.

The top court was moved by Allahabad-based senior lawyer Umesh Narain and NGO Health for Millions challenging the December 15 High Court judgment by which it had held that 2014 amended Rules were arbitrary and unconstitutional. 

The matter was heard around 3.30 PM after senior counsel Anand Grover appearing for the NGO and lawyer Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for Umesh Narain, had earlier in the morning mentioned the matter for an early listing.

The High Court order, the petition by Umesh Narain said, will have the serious and numbing impact on India's fight against tobacco, as it is regressive, retrograde and jeopardizes future generations of the country having maximum number of youth in the world.A

Grover, who appeared for the NGO, said that the world over, the trend was on increasing the space of the warning but the High Court ordered reducing it.

The High Court order had come on a batch of petitions by various tobacco manufacturing companies who had challenged the 2014 modified rules mandating that the health warning should cover 85 per cent of the tobacco packaging space.

The petitioners told the top court that the implementation of Regulations mandating 85 per cent pictorial warning on both sides of tobacco products was a culmination of an extremely long, cumbersome and excruciating fight by public heath activists and people whose life and family had been ruined by Tobacco, against the mighty tobacco industry.

Graphic pictorial warnings which occupy 85 per cent of the package on both sides will create awareness not only amongst the existing consumers of tobacco products about the grave health risks involved but will also dissuade the younger generation from becoming tobacco addicts, the petitioners told the court.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

edexworks
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp