Yogi Adityanath hails SC decision on no vote for religion, demands more explanation

The SC in its verdict on 1995 Hindutva judgement said no politician can seek a vote in the name of caste, creed, or religion.

Published: 05th January 2017 10:38 AM  |   Last Updated: 05th January 2017 10:38 AM   |  A+A-

Yogi Adityanath

BJP MP Yogi Adityanath (File|PTI)


GORAKHPUR: Hailing the Supreme Court's ruling on no vote for religion, Bharatiya Janata Party ( BJP) MP from Gorakhpur Yogi Adityanath has asserted that the provision needs more detailed explanation.

“It is a welcome move and Representation of People’s act (RPA)  already limits politicians from asking for votes on the basis of religion, but this provision needs to be explained,” he said.

Adityanath added that India’s Constitution is secular and the practice of seeking vote on the basis of caste, creed, religion, community and language should be stopped.

The Supreme Court, on Monday, in its verdict on 1995 Hindutva judgement said no politician can seek a vote in the name of caste, creed, or religion.

The seven-judge constitution bench of the apex court further stated that election was a secular exercise and therefore, the process which follows it should also be adopted.

"Election is a secular exercise and thereby its way and its process should be followed also. Function of an elected representative should be secular," it said.

"Relationship between man and God is an individual choice and state is forbidden to such an activity," the apex court said further.

Earlier, during the hearing by a seven judge Constitutional bench, the apex court had said that it won't reconsider 1995 judgment which defined Hindutva as "a way of life and not a religion."

The observations came after an on interlocutory application filed by social activist Teesta Setalvad requested the bench to reconsider the 95 judgment.

The bench, headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur, said the court will not go into the larger debate as to what is Hindutva or what its meaning is and will not reconsider the 1995 judgment.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp