Will Supreme Court look within, examine attempts to influence its judges? Call to be taken today

The Supreme Court will decide on Tuesday whether a petition seeking a judicial probe into allegations that attempts were made to bribe apex court judges can be entertained.

Published: 14th November 2017 11:10 AM  |   Last Updated: 14th November 2017 11:10 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court of India | PTI

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court will decide on Tuesday whether a petition seeking a judicial probe into allegations that attempts were made to bribe apex court judges can be entertained. In the hearing, a three-judge bench headed by Justice RK Agrawal said it was likely to pass an order in the matter on Tuesday.

This is the same case that was referred to a constitution bench of five most senior judges by Justices J Chelameswar and Abdul Nazeer on November 9. Instead, Chief Justice Dipak Misra hurriedly set up a separate five-judge bench on November 10, which recalled Justice Chelameswar’s order and sent the case to a three-judge bench he picked.

The volatile hearing saw the bench questioning advocate Prashant Bhushan, whether filing of two identically-worded petitions was not a matter of propriety and whether it would not amount to forum shopping if it was sought to be listed before a particular bench. 

Justice Arun Mishra told Bhushan, “Because of your act, the whole country is doubting the credibility of this institution. This petition has damaged the image of the most important judge, the CJI, of this court. Damages have been done to a great extent.”

ALSO READ: Judges bribery-Supreme Court charges petitioner of impropriety

Senior advocate Shanti Bhushan, appearing for Kamini Jaiswal, questioned why the composition of the benches was changed and said, “Which bench will be appropriate to hear this petition?”

CJI Dipak Misra

Shanti also pointed out that Justice A M Khanwilkar should not be part of the bench as he had dealt with the medical college case directly. All three judges who heard the case on Monday were also part of the constitution bench set up by the CJI on November 10.

ALSO READ: Supreme Court judge's bribery case leaves Lucknow medical college students clueless about future

Justice Arun Mishra said, “The FIR is against a retired judge. Today we will answer all your queries. We will also let you know why the CJI today is not on this bench.”

Shanti responded, “Allegations in FIR are implicating corruptions in functioning of this court. Judicial authority includes every authority of the court, including each and every bench of the Supreme Court. When the order to include five senior-most judges of the Supreme Court was passed, it is binding on every bench including the CJI. Article 142 is binding on the Chief Justice, according to which a Supreme Court judge can pass any order to do complete justice.”


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp