Very disturbed about what has been happening: Supreme Court

The SC expressed anguish over the events surrounding the discussion about the proposed impeachment of CJI Dipak Misra in the public.

Published: 21st April 2018 06:59 AM  |   Last Updated: 21st April 2018 07:23 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court (File | PTI)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday expressed anguish over the events surrounding the discussion about the proposed impeachment of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra in the public.

“We are very disturbed about what has been is very unfortunate what is happening,” the bench of Justices AK Sikri and Ashok Bhushan said, while hearing a PIL filed by NGO ‘In Pursuit of Justice’ that sought a restraint against the legislators as well as the media to discuss a proposed removal motion.

The SC bench also sought the assistance of Attorney General KK Venugopal in the matter.The observation assumes significance as it comes on a day when the Congress and other Opposition parties submitted a notice to initiate impeachment proceedings against the CJI. The Opposition move comes a day after the Supreme Court  dismissed petitions seeking an independent probe into the death of Special CBI judge BH Loya.Appearing for the NGO, senior advocate Meenakshi Arora submitted that a judge cannot act fearlessly if such discourse takes place while he is in office and the removal motion has not even been brought.

“Under Article 121, even parliamentarians are restricted to discuss the conduct of a judge up to a certain stage. How can these legislators, as private citizens, talk about the same issue as and when they want?” Arora contended.On this, the bench said the law was very clear and everyone was supposed to know the law. 

“Even the legislature should know the law. It is still happening. The question is what can we do now?”

The counsel, however, said a judge has to perform his duties “fearlessly” and such public statements cannot be made by the politicians like this.The lawyer, then, requested the bench, “please restrain the media”.To this, the Supreme Court  said it would not do so without hearing the Attorney General and posted the matter for hearing on May 7.

 The plea, filed by the NGO, has sought laying down of guidelines or modalities regulating procedure to be followed by parliamentarians , desirous of initiating proceedings for removal of a judge of the Supreme Court or a high court, prior to initiating a motion under Article 124(4) and (5) and 217(1)(b) of the Constitution. (With Agency inputs)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp