Impeachment row: CJI Dipak Misra, other judges sat at 10.45 am to undertake court proceedings

CJI Misra, who usually holds his court at 10.30 AM, entered the courtroom almost 15 minutes late and started hearing lawyers who wanted their petitions to be listed for urgent mentioning.

Published: 23rd April 2018 12:17 PM  |   Last Updated: 23rd April 2018 06:39 PM   |  A+A-

Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra. | PTI File Photo


NEW DELHI: Chief Justice (CJI) Dipak Misra and other Supreme Court judges today held a longer than usual morning meeting, leading to delay of about 15 minutes in starting of the proceedings in all courts, amid speculation that they discussed the notice to remove the CJI and its rejection.

The usual morning meeting of judges coincided with the breaking news emanating from the office of Rajya Sabha Chairperson and Vice President M Venkaiah Naidu that he had rejected the notice to remove the CJI with point-wise rebuttals after consulting legal experts.

Litigants, lawyers and journalists, having their eyes on the clock, were seen murmuring about the possible reasons for the delay in start of court proceedings in the CJI's courts.

All the courts began work at around 10.45 AM instead of the scheduled 10.30 AM.

CJI Misra, who usually holds his court at 10.30 AM, was calm and composed when he entered the packed courtroom along with companion judges -- Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, at 10.45 AM.

The bench immediately started hearing lawyers and litigants who wanted their petitions to be listed for urgent hearing.

BJP leader Subramanian Swamy was among the first few litigants to mention their petitions for urgent hearing. He sought listing of his plea seeking enforcement of the fundamental right to worship at the disputed site in Ayodhya.

"No.. no. Not now," the smiling CJI said, while refusing urgent hearing on Swamy's plea on the Ayodhya dispute.

Later, Swamy welcomed Naidu's decision to reject the motion of Congress and other opposition parties to oust the CJI and said it could have been dismissed the day it was filed on the sole ground that the contents were disclosed to the public before filing it.

Speculation was rife among lawyers that the judges held a brief informal meeting before they started today's business to discuss the issue surrounding the removal notice.

The Rajya Sabha Chairman today rejected the notice for impeachment of the CJI, citing lack of substantial merit in it.

Naidu held extensive consultations with top legal and constitutional experts, including former chief justices and judges, before taking the decision, sources said.

The rejection of the notice came a day after he held the consultations to determine the maintainability of the motion.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp