Elevation of Justice KM Joseph: Government’s reasoning for rejecting Supreme Court collegium’s recommendation doesn’t hold water

The three reasons - regional representation, seniority and absence of SC/ST judges - cited by Centre for withholding the SC collegium’s recommendation to elevate Justice K M Joseph do not hold water.

Published: 27th April 2018 02:01 AM  |   Last Updated: 27th April 2018 10:18 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court of India (Photo | EPS)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The three reasons - regional representation, seniority and absence of SC/ST judges - cited by the Centre for withholding the Supreme Court collegium’s recommendation to elevate Uttarakhand Chief Justice K M Joseph do not hold water.

READ | Tussle between judiciary and Centre reaches all-time high: Justice Joseph’s elevation spiked

The government said his parent high court, Kerala, is adequately represented in the SC and other high courts. For, one SC judge and three HC chief justices hail from Kerala. 

However, Kerala is not the only HC to have multiple chief justices among the 24 HC in India. The HCs of Bombay, Rajasthan and MP have two chief justices each in different HCs. 

In the SC, Kerala has one judge — Justice Kurian Joseph. But there are six parent high courts that have more than one representative from their state in the SC. Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, Allahabad, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka have two judges each in the SC whereas three apex court judges hail from Bombay.  

ALSO READ | Recommendation not meeting parameters: Government on not approving Supreme Court Collegium’s recommendation to elevate Justice KM Joseph

If past appointments are anything to go by, then “seniority” should not have been a hurdle for Justice K M Joseph’s elevation. For example, current SC judges Mohan M Shantanagoudar and S Abdul Nazeer weren’t the senior most judges at time of their elevation to the apex court. In fact, they superseded as many as 20 judges. 

Justice Nazeer of the Karnataka High Court became the first judge in two decades who was promoted to the SC without being first elevated as a chief justice or acting chief justice of a HC. At that time, the SC collegium chose to supersede the two senior judges, and it was accepted by both the Ministry of Law and the President of India. 

Justice Ranjan Gogoi, who is set to become the next CJI, was also elevated to the SC much before his present colleagues Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph and A K Sikri. On May 13, 2016, justices D Y Chandrachud and A M Khanwilkar of the Bombay HC were inducted into the SC though it already had a judge from the Bombay HC - Justice S A Bobde since 2013. 

On the lack of SC/ST representation, it’s a fact that since 2010, when K G Balakrishnan retired as CJI, no judge belonging to these communities was appointed. KGB was the only Dalit judge to have served as CJI.

Former Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan (EPS)

There is no Dalit chief justice in any HC anywhere in India. Although there is no rule for caste-based reservation in the higher judiciary, it has been said in multiple forums that minorities should be given adequate representation in the higher judiciary.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp