STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Supreme Court reserves interim order on mandatory training for ultrasonography

Earlier, the apex court had issued notice on the Centre's plea challenging the High Court decision setting aside the mandatory six-month training required to perform the ultrasonography.

Published: 21st February 2018 08:30 PM  |   Last Updated: 21st February 2018 08:30 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court (PTI)

By PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today reserved its order on a batch of pleas challenging a decision of the Delhi High Court setting aside the mandatory six-month training needed under the rules for performing ultrasonography.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud heard arguments on behalf of the Centre and other bodies in favour and against the 2016 Delhi High Court verdict and reserved its interim order on the issue whether some specialist doctors can be allowed to continue doing ultrasonography.

Disposing of petitions including those filed by the Indian Medical Association (IMA) and the Sonology Society of India, the High Court had set aside Rule 3 (3)(1)(b) of the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Rules to the extent that it required a person, desirous of setting up of ultrasound clinic, to undergo six-month training in the manner prescribed.

Senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for one of the parties, said as an interim measure, cardiologists and gynaecologists may be allowed to continue doing ultrasonography test till the petitions against the High Court order are finally decided.

Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand, appearing for the Centre, assailed the High Court decision, saying the government was well within its right to frame the rules.

Earlier, the apex court had issued notice on the Centre's plea challenging the High Court decision setting aside the mandatory six-month training required to perform the ultrasonography.

Besides the Centre, Indian Radiological and Imaging Association, the association of radiologists in the country, had moved the apex court challenging the High Court's decision on the issue.

The high court had declared the Rule 3(3)(1)(b) framed under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994 as ultra vires.

It had also done away with the mandatory six-month training which was earlier required to be able to perform an ultrasound under the ambit of the law.

The PIL, filed by NGO Voluntary Health Association of Punjab, was disposed of in 2016 with the apex court passing a slew of directions to stop female foeticide in the country.

PTI SJK MNL RKS ARC - 21021938 NNNN

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments(1)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Dr. Rakesh Shrivastava

    Will it be prudent and just if only the PhD in law be made mandatory to preside in supreme Court's.
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp