
Security personnel inspect the site of an IED blast where nine CRPF personnel were killed and two more were injured after Maoists ambushed them in Kistaram area of Chhattisgarh's Sukma district on Tuesday. | PTI
Security personnel inspect the site of an IED blast where nine CRPF personnel were killed and two more were injured after Maoists ambushed them in Kistaram area of Chhattisgarh's Sukma district on Tuesday. | PTI
RAIPUR: Tuesday’s Sukma blast is not the first time that Mine-Protected Vehicles (MPVs) have been blown to smithereens by the Maoists in their strongholds in Chhattisgarh.
Counter-insurgency experts are unanimous that the anti-landmine vehicle turns out to be “ineffective” in Maoist strongholds where the cadres — known to have accessed to RDX —detonate heavy improvised explosive devices (IEDs).
So, does the central paramilitary and police leadership needs to be educated on what should be followed and strictly avoided for their men in the virtual war zone of Bastar where IEDs are planted by the Red brigade in inhospitable terrain?
“No armoured personnel carrier or vehicle can withstand IEDs, which are often 20 kg and above in Chhattisgarh. The areas cited as Maoist stronghold and epicentre remain heavily mined. Such vehicles are suitable along the western border of Rajasthan and Pakistan where 100 to 1,200-gram explosives are used. The MPVs are good only for small arm fire and against the conventional mines,” said Brigadier (retired) B K Ponwar, director in Kanker-based jungle warfare college.
Despite the anti-landmine carrier provided with helmets, seat-belts and various safety equipment and measures, the MPVs are not effective when trapped in heavy explosion as seen at Kishtaram in Sukma when the vehicle was blown up high in the air, killing the personnel nside.The guerrilla warfare experts feel the lessons are not learned despite the casualties in earlier cases involving MPVs in Maoist-affected areas.
Former Chhattisgarh DGP Vishwaranjan asserts nowhere in the world any MPV can bear the massive impact of IEDs weighing 20kg and above.
“The vehicle can become stranded even in a blast caused by 10 kg explosive. It can be effective against the bullets during a gun-battle,” he says.
And, the odds are heavily stacked against the security personnel considering the government-owned ordnance factory bring out MPVs that cannot withstand the impact of IEDs cobbled together with 20 kg RDX.
Did the CRPF personnel ignore SOPs?
The Sukma attack once again saw the strong presence of Maoists, whose superior intelligence network proved fatal for the CRPF personnel at Kishtaram in Sukma district. Many of the deceased were not in their combat fatigues at the blast site.
The Kishtaram CRPF base camp was barely 3 km from the site where the rebels triggered powerful blast. “So, that means no prior mandatory operation on Road Opening Patrol (ROP) was done when the vehicles were to be used on the route and the regular routine patrolling near the camp seems missing. The Maoists consequently got enough scope to plant heavy IEDs there,” an ex-army officer feels.
There were repeated alerts from intelligence agencies about the heavy presence of the rebels in the region but apparently little precautionary moves were carried out and the prompt coordination between the paramilitary forces and the state police in the region was seen lacking.
“It’s an unfortunate incident and not the moment to ponder on such issue. There is alert everyday and the attacks are not uncommon in Maoist stronghold,” Special DG, D M Awasthi says.
Senior police officials engaged in anti-Maoist operations state troopers are expected to be much more alert when the cadres carry out their annual Tactical Counter Offensive Campaign (TCOC) which continues from March till June.
During this duration, the rebels are desperate to regain military strength, infuse confidence among their cadres and simultaneously mount pressure on the forces.
O
P
E
N
Comments
Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.
The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.
Latest
Fringe elements trying to create panic, disharmony: Priest of vandalised temple in Canada
Budget 2023 has very little to offer to children, disabled, elderly, say rights groups
SC issues guidelines to avoid delay in release of undertrials after getting bail
Adani empire's Hindenburg report hit tops USD 100 billion
Jharkhand HC takes suo motu cognizance of high-rise fire which left 14 dead
Don't know who's benefiting from my being in jail: Journalist Siddique Kappan after walking free