Rights rainbow shines as Supreme Court partially strikes down Section 377

In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court on Thursday legalised gay sex in the country by partially striking down the 158-year-old colonial era law.

Published: 07th September 2018 06:50 AM  |   Last Updated: 07th September 2018 08:48 AM   |  A+A-


LGBT community members celebrate after Supreme Court decriminalised Sec 377 of the IPC at Marine Drive in Kochi on Thursday (Photo | Melton Antony/EPS)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court on Thursday legalised gay sex in the country by partially striking down the 158-year-old colonial era law. It held that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code had become an “odious weapon” to harass the LGBT community subjecting them to discrimination and unequal treatment.

Quoting the German thinker Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, ‘I am what I am, so take me as I am’, Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice A M Khanwilkar said, “Individual has sovereignty over his or her body and can surrender autonomy wilfully to another individual and their intimacy in privacy is a matter of their choice and such concept of identity is not only sacred but is also in recognition of the quintessential facet of humanity in a person’s nature.”

READ: Guess which country legalised same-sex marriage first

After decades-long legal battle, a five-judge bench led by CJI diluted Section 377 saying the law violated the right to equality enshrined in the Constitution.

The court, however, held that Section 377 would apply to unnatural sex involving animals and minor children. Sexual acts without consent will continue to be a crime.

ALSO READ: UN chief welcomes Supreme Court decision with hashtag LoveWins

In four concurring opinions, the bench declared the Section as irrational, indefensible and manifestly arbitrary. The judgment will have a wide-ranging economic and social impact on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer citizens and will prevent discrimination of gay employees.

Although the ruling will not permit same-sex marriage, it is a step towards greater equality and gives the community their civil and economic rights which were barred till Thursday.

Justice Indu Malhotra, the lone woman judge on the bench, said, “History owes an apology to the members of this community and their families, for the delay in providing redressal for the ignominy and ostracism that they have suffered through the centuries. The members of this community were compelled to live a life full of fear of reprisal and persecution.”

READ THIS: Who are the main petitioners?

The petitioners behind the case include the Naz Foundation, an NGO working on HIV and sexual-health issues; Keshav Suri, executive director of The Lalit Suri Hospitality Group; a group of IIT students; Humsafar Trust; Delhi-based chef Ritu Dalmia; and, Arif Jafar, founder of Bharosa Trust.

Justice Rohinton F Nariman, in his separate opinion, held that homosexuals have a fundamental right to live with dignity. They are entitled to be treated as human beings and should be allowed to imbibe the spirit of fraternity.

“It’s historic,” Anand Grover, a lawyer for the Naz Foundation, said after the verdict was delivered. “It will change the way we see the society, polity and human rights of India.”

ALSO READ: Highlights from Supreme Court's verdict

In the 493-page ruling, the CJI penned down 166 pages and cited several cases from the South Africa where people’s identities are not of paramount importance. “It is true that the principle of choice can never be absolute under a liberal Constitution and the law restricts one individual’s choice to prevent harm or injury to others,” he said.

The CJI added that sexual orientation was one of the many biological phenomena which is natural and inherent in an individual.

Justice D Y Chandrachud in his 188-page ruling said, “Sexual and gender-based minorities cannot live in fear, if the Constitution has to have a meaning for them on even terms. Sexual orientation has become a target for exploitation, if not blackmail, in a networked and digital age.”

READ HERE: Seven things you must know about Supreme Court's historic verdict

Writers, thinkers CITED in verdict

CJI Misra and Justice Khanwilkar referred to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Arthur Schopenhauer, John Stuart Mill and William Shakespeare. Justice Nariman quoted Oscar Wilde, while Justice D Y Chandrachud mentioned Leonard Cohen and Vikram Seth


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp