Supreme Court extends house arrest of rights activists in Koregaon-Bhima violence till September 17

The Maharashtra police had arrested the five activists on August 28 in connection with an FIR lodged following a conclave.

Published: 12th September 2018 12:52 PM  |   Last Updated: 12th September 2018 02:25 PM   |  A+A-

(T-B) Sudha Bharadwaj was arrested in Faridabad, Arun Ferreira in Mumbai, Writer Vara Vara Rao from Hyderabad, Journalist Gautam Navlakha from New-Delhi and 61-Year old Vernon Gonsalves from Mumbai. | (File | Agencies)


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Wednesday extended the house arrest of five rights activists who were arrested in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence case till September 17.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud adjourned the hearing on the plea filed by historian Romila Thapar and four others to September 17 after it was submitted that senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who is representing the petitioners, was busy in another court.

Earlier, Singhvi appeared before the bench and submitted that the hearing on Thapar's plea be conducted after 12 pm as he has to appear in another matter.

The court was hearing the plea filed against the arrest of the rights activists -- Varavara Rao, Arun Ferreira, Vernon Gonsalves, Sudha Bharadwaj and Gautam Navlakha -- in the case.

The Maharashtra police had arrested the five activists on August 28 in connection with an FIR lodged following a conclave -- 'Elgaar Parishad' -- held on December 31 last year that had later triggered violence at Koregaon-Bhima village.

On August 29, the apex court ordered the house arrest of the activists, saying "dissent is the safety valve of democracy".


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Patriot

    SC has two different rules for anti-nationals and patriotic citizens 1. If siesta setalvad needs to be taken into custodial interrogation by police inspitevof producing evidence it will stay that whereas if someone who is behind bars on frivolous grounds they will claim they will not interfere in legal process 2. If some stone pelting terrorist is arrested it is human rights violation. If an army person is killed by this terrorists it is not human rights violations 3. If an army officer cool.shrikanth prohith files a petition to probe the cospiracy SC will claim it will not interfere in trial process but if some urban naxals and urban terrorists are arrested it will interfere in trial process SHAME SHAME SHAME
    4 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp