Congress to approach SC against Aadhaar Act passed as money bill

Justice D Y Chandrachud, who wrote the judgement separately, said that the Aadhaar Act could not have been passed as Money Bill as it amounted to a fraud on the Constitution.

Published: 26th September 2018 06:33 PM  |   Last Updated: 26th September 2018 09:10 PM   |  A+A-

Congress leader Kapil Sibal speaks during a press conference at AICC in New Delhi on Wednesday, 26th September 2018. (Photo | Shekhar Yadav/ EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Congress will approach the Supreme Court against the top court's order upholding the passage of the Aadhaar Act, 2016 as a money bill.

"One important part of the SC judgment to be noted is if in future a Lok Sabha Speaker declares a bill as Money Bill, then the court can review this and revert. We will approach a seven-judge bench to consider this verdict again as this is clearly not a Money Bill," Congress spokesperson Kapil Sibal said.

"If the government does not bring the Act to the Rajya Sabha for amendments, we will definitely move the Supreme Court," he said, adding that the Aadhaar Bill’s passage violated the fundamental right to privacy and is a gross abuse of the money bill route.

The money bill route was adopted by the government as the NDA had a majority in the Lower House of Parliament but lacked numerical strength in the Upper House. The controversy started on March 11, 2016 when the Aadhaar Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha after Speaker Sumitra Mahajan ruled it as a 'Money Bill'. It was then moved to the Rajya Sabha on March 16 and the Upper House returned the Bill with five amendments moved by Congress member Jairam Ramesh. These recommendations were rejected by the Lok Sabha, which passed the legislation, the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016.

Jairam Ramesh then petitioned the Supreme Court and argued that a bill can be declared as a money bill only in six specific circumstances or matters incidental to them as enumerated in Article 110 of the Constitution. The Aadhaar Act did not relate to any of those circumstances, he said. He had even termed the passage of the Aadhaar Act a "constitutional fraud".

On Wednesday, Justice Chandrachud of the apex court too echoed a similar view. "Bypassing the Rajya Sabha to pass the Aadhaar Act amounted to subterfuge, and the law was liable to be struck down as being violative of Article 110 of the Constitution. Article 110 has specific grounds for Money Bill and the Aadhaar law went beyond this," he said, adding that in the current form, the Act cannot be held to be constitutional.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • rajan

    now it is too late
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp