Ayodhya hearing in SC begins, Court rejects plea for live streaming proceedings

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, was told by senior advocate Sushil Jain, appearing for Nirmohi Akhara, that it was seeking management and possession of the area.

Published: 06th August 2019 12:19 PM  |   Last Updated: 07th August 2019 08:55 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (Photo| Shekhar Yadav, EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday began day-to-day hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case after mediation efforts in the decades-old dispute had failed.

Nirmohi Akhara, one of the parties in the case, was the first to begin arguments before the five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi. Arguing that the possession of the Ram Janmabhoomi site was exclusive to Hindus, it said, “Muslims have not been allowed to enter the disputed structure since 1934.”

ALSO READ: Ayodhya case hearing sees exchange of words between bench, senior advocate

Seeking control of the entire 2.77-acre land, which is under dispute, senior advocate Sushil Jain said, “We were in possession of inner courtyard and Ram Janmasthan for hundreds of years. Outer courtyard having ‘Sita Rasoi’, ‘Chabutra’, ‘Bhandar Grah’ were in our possession and it was never a part of dispute in any case.”He added Jhansi ki Rani was also protected by them when she took refuge at the Ayodhya temple. The hearing also witnessed heated exchanges between the bench and senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan appearing for a Muslim party.

When the bench asked the Nirmohi Akhara counsel to confine his arguments to the civil dispute and avoid reading written statements, Dhavan jumped in and asked if there would be curtailment of arguments.
The CJI said there won’t be any curtailment of arguments but Dhavan repeated his comment. At this, the CJI said, “Dr Dhavan, keep the dignity of the court.”

The bench also rejected the plea of K N Govindacharya seeking recording of the case proceedings.The counsel representing Nirmohi Akhara claimed rights over the disputed 2.77 acres and said they have been possessing, managing and worshipping Lord Ram Lalla since time immemorial at the site.

“In any case, you have been given one-third of the disputed area in preliminary decree by the High Court,” Justice D Y Chandrachud told the Nirmohi Akhara’s counsel.

“Before 1934, Muslims were offering regular prayers, the High court had noted in the verdict,” the bench observed while slating the hearing for Wednesday.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties.

The bench, also comprising Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer is conducting a day-to-day hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case in Ayodhya after the efforts to arrive at an amicable settlement through mediation have failed.

With inputs from PTI

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp