Kerala, Punjab defy Parliament, say won't implement Citizenship Amendment Bill

However, Constitutional experts pointed out that a state has no relevant role to play as far as CAB is concerned. The stand taken by Kerala chief minister has no legal relevance. 

Published: 12th December 2019 11:12 PM  |   Last Updated: 13th December 2019 12:06 AM   |  A+A-

Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and Punjab Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Singh (File Photos | PTI, EPS)

By Express News Service

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM/CHANDIGARH: The Kerala and Punjab governments on Thursday categorically stated that they will not implement the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill (CAB).

READ | Citizenship Bill: Two die of bullet injuries in Assam, mobile internet cut in Tripura, Meghalaya

While Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said a state government can't be forced to implement the legislation even though citizenship falls under the Union List, his Punjab counterpart Captain Amarinder Singh said his government would not allow the legislation to be implemented as it is a direct assault on India’s secular character.

However, Constitutional experts pointed out that a state has no relevant role to play as far as the CAB is concerned. The stand taken by the Kerala chief minister has no legal relevance. 

As citizenship falls under the Union List, a state government can't say that it will not implement the legislation, they said. 

Talking to Express, former Kerala High Court judge B Kamal Pasha echoed the experts. He said, "Such a statement might have come on the spur of the moment. As citizenship falls under the Union List, a state government can't say that it will not implement it."

Noted legal expert Advocate Kaleeshwaram Raj also said the statement by Pinarayi is erroneous as neither a state government nor a state legislature can question a subject that falls under the Centre's domain.

"As per legal standards, they are not competent to decide on such matters. A state government could instead register its disagreement with the bill or could endorse the protest. But it can't step aside from the duty of implementing it," he said.

READ | Northeast burning, it's a repeat of J&K, says Ghulam Nabi Azad

However, both Justice Kamal Pasha and advocate Kaleeshwaram Raj are of the view that the Bill is unconstitutional. According to Justice Kamal Pasha, as the bill itself is an unconstitutional one, a state government can protect its citizens through various means. It should explore such options. 

Kaleeshwaram Raj said since the bill itself violates the right to equality, any citizen or group of citizens or political parties can approach the court.

In Punjab, CM Amarinder Singh said the Parliament had no authority to pass a law that defiled the Constitution and violated its basic principles and fundamental rights of the people of India. He declared the Bill as 'null and void’ on account of the fact that it was against the tenets and values contained in the Constitution.

Pointing to the divisive nature of the law, Amarinder said any legislation that seeks to divide the people of the country on religious lines was illegal and unethical, and could not be allowed to sustain.

READ | Doubts over citizenship bill not baseless: Assam Speaker

It was the duty of an elected government to safeguard the cherished values ingrained in the Constitution and not destroy them, he said, making it clear that he would not let such a Constitutional violation take place under his regime.

“How can you leave out a large section of the Indian population from the protection they have been getting since we declared India a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic, assuring its citizens justice, equality and liberty…,” asked Amarinder, pointing out that by linking citizenship with religion, CAB would undermine the very foundations of the nation.

“What if other countries, where Indians are settled in large numbers and have acquired their citizenship, decide to bring in similar legislations? What will happen to those Indians if the countries of their stay decide to withdraw their citizenship on account of their religious beliefs?” asked Amarinder.

The move, said Amarinder, was retrograde and regressive, and sought to take India back from the progressive charter mandated by its Constitution. Instead of using brute majority in Parliament to push the Bill through, the central government should have discussed the matter with all parties and tried to evolve a  consensus, if at all it felt the legislation was in the interest of India and its people, he added.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp