Allahabad HC strips SP MLA Abdullah Azam Khan of assembly membership

Kazim Ali Khan, the petitioner in the case happened to be the BSP candidate from Suar assembly constituency of Rampur and had lost to Abdullah, who had fought the poll on SP ticket.

Published: 16th December 2019 09:44 PM  |   Last Updated: 16th December 2019 09:44 PM   |  A+A-

Abdullah Azam Khan

Abdullah Azam Khan (Photo | @AbdullahAzamMLA/Twitter)

Express News Service

LUCKNOW: In a major jolt to the Samajwadi Party, the Allahabad High Court set aside the election of Mohammad Abdullah Azam Khan, son of Samajwadi Party (SP) MP Azam Khan, from Suar Tanda constituency under Rampur parliamentary segment of Uttar Pradesh on Monday.

Thus the court stripped Abdullah Azam of his UP Assembly membership by declaring his election as null and void. After the court’s judgement, the effective strength of the Samajwadi Party in the Assembly will come down to 48 of 403 seats.

Initially, the SP had won 47 seats and its tally went up to 49 after the October bypolls. Responding to the election petition filed by Nawab Kazim Ali Khan of Rampur, the high court bench comprising Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani said that Abdullah Azam Khan was less than 25 years of age while filing his nomination papers for UP Assembly elections-2017 on January 25, 2017.

He did not fulfil the age criteria while the scrutiny of his nomination papers on January 28, 2017, and also when the result of the polls was declared on March 11, 2017.

“Thus he was not qualified to fill the seat in the legislature of the state as per the provisions of Article 173 (b) of the Constitution of India. Hence, the election petition is allowed,” said Justice Kesarvani.

He added, “The election of the Mohammad Abdullah Azam Khan from 34-Suar assembly constituency is declared void and consequently it is set aside.”

The court directed the Registrar General of High Court to intimate Election Commission of India about this decision and also the Speaker of the Uttar Pradesh legislative assembly.

Kazim Ali Khan, the petitioner in the case happened to be the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) candidate from Suar assembly constituency of Rampur and had lost to Abdullah, who had fought the poll on SP ticket.

In his petition, Kazim Ali Khan, a four-time MLA from the same constituency, claimed that Abdullah was born on January 1, 1993. He was thus younger than the mandatory 25 years and did not qualify to become an MLA.

To buttress his contention, Kazim Ali cited Abdullah’s matriculation certificate where his date of birth is January 1, 1993.

According to Kazim, Abdullah filed false documents in support of his age proof - according to his educational qualification his date of birth was January 1, 1993, while the date of birth on his birth certificate produced for contesting the election, was shown as September 30, 1990.

On these grounds, the petitioner had requested the court to declare the election of Abdullah as null and void.

During the course of hearing, Abdullah’s mother and the then Rajya Sabha MP Tazeen Fatima had appeared on the court as witness claiming that her son was born on September 30, 1990, along with Dr Uma Singh, senior gynaecologist of Queen Mary’s Hospital under KG Medical University, Lucknow, who appeared in court as witness.

Dr S S Ken, one of the members of the medical team which conducted a bone ossification test of Abdullah, also testified as a witness in the case and supported the findings of the test. The court had reserved the order on September 27, 2019.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp