Can't feed birds from flat's balcony and create nuisance for others, says SC

The top court refused to interfere with an order restraining a woman from feeding birds from her balcony flat in a high rise building in Mumbai.

Published: 19th March 2019 08:49 AM  |   Last Updated: 19th March 2019 08:49 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme court of India, Supreme court

Supreme Court (Photo| Shekhar Yadav, EPS)


NEW DELHI: A person cannot feed birds from a flat's balcony creating nuisance due to droppings and filth for other occupants in a residential society, the Supreme Court has said.

The top court refused to interfere with an order restraining a woman from feeding birds from her balcony flat in a high rise building in Mumbai.

"If you are living in a residential society, then you have to conduct yourself according to the norms," said a bench of Justices U U Lalit and Indu Malhotra.

Counsel appearing for petitioner Jigeesha Thakore said it was not a case of a nuisance but of strained business relations between the parties concerned due to which a civil suit was filed against her in the lower court.

The bench said in a recent order that the Bombay City Civil Court on September 27, 2013 had granted an interim injunction by which it had restrained the woman from feeding the birds from the balcony of her flat.

It noted that when the civil court order was challenged by the woman before the Bombay High Court, it had refused to interfere and made the interim injunction as absolute by dismissing the appeal on July 12, 2016.

"In the circumstances, we see no reason to interfere in the matter. The special leave petitions are dismissed," the bench said while directing the civil court to dispose of the pending suit as expeditiously as possible.

In 2011, Dilip Sumanlal Shah and Meena Shah residing in the 10th floor of an apartment in Worli, moved the civil court against Thakore and her family members residing on the 14th floor.

The Shah family sought an injunction against the Thakore family for creating a nuisance for them and other occupants of the building by feeding birds with water and grains from her balcony.

The 20-storey co-operative housing society had also moved court against Thakore family seeking direction to restrain them from feeding the birds from the balcony of their flat.

In their plea before the civil court, Shah family contended that Thakore family has installed a metal platform outside their balcony window.

They argued that a large number of birds flocked the platform causing nuisance due to droppings and filth.

Shah family argued that Thakores' start bird feeding at 6.30 am in the morning which is done several times in the day till evening.

The society had requested the Thakores' to use the public places designated for feeding birds and passed a resolution that no member will be allowed to feed birds from their balconies or windows.

Thakores' in their reply to the civil suit by Shah had contended that they were animal welfare activist and associated with an NGO since 1998 and ran a dog.shelter.

They said that Shahs used to be a regular supplier of medical and surgical equipment to the NGO but their relations turned sour.

They said was not possible to feed birds on the ground level as they could come under a car or be attacked by some cats and dogs.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Veeraraghavan

    Supreme court has time for this but not for ram temple case. Nice and logical set of priorities
    1 year ago reply
  • Anna

    Dumb verdict
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp