Nirav Modi in possession of three passports, multiple residency cards: Fugitive diamantaire's lawyer to UK court

Besides the passports, the court was told that Modi possessed multiple residency cards, some of them expired, but covering countries/regions such as the UAE, Singapore and Hong Kong.

Published: 21st March 2019 01:16 AM  |   Last Updated: 21st March 2019 08:56 AM   |  A+A-

Nirav Modi

Nirav Modi. (File Photo)


LONDON: Fugitive diamantaire Nirav Modi, arrested by Scotland Yard on behalf of the Indian authorities, was in possession of three passports, it emerged when he was produced before the Westminster Magistrates' Court in London on Wednesday.

The 48-year-old's defence team, led by barrister George Hepburne Scott, told the court about the existence of the multiple travel documents during his plea for bail, which was rejected by District Judge Marie Mallon.

ALSO READ | Nirav Modi to be held in one of England's most overcrowded jails 

The passports, since revoked by the Indian authorities, include one now in possession of the Metropolitan Police, a second expired passport lying with the UK Home Office and a third with the UK's Driving and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA).

Besides the passports, the court was told that Modi possessed multiple residency cards, some of them expired, but covering countries/regions such as the UAE, Singapore and Hong Kong.

"He is the opposite of a flight risk and demonstrably so, given his keenness to fully cooperate with the [UK] authorities," claimed Scott, while offering to surrender all residency and travel documents.

It remained unclear how Modi, wanted on fraud and money laundering charges amounting to USD 2 billion, came to be in possession of multiple passports.

In her decision to turn down Modi's bail plea, the judge noted that he possessed the "means" to acquire further travel documents and therefore there are "substantial grounds" to believe he may not surrender before the court if granted bail.

ALSO READ: India engaged with UK for earliest extradition of Nirav Modi: MEA

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), arguing the case for his extradition to face the Indian justice system on behalf of the Indian government, had strongly opposed bail because Modi had "deliberately evaded justice" and not returned to India despite a series of criminal summons issued by Indian courts.

Modi's defence team, which includes Anand Doobay of Boutique Law -- also the representative in the extradition case of liquor tycoon Vijay Mallya, argued that their client arrived in the UK in January 2018 before any allegations had emerged in India.

He has since been living in London "lawfully" and his son has been studying at school in the city for five years.

It was claimed he arrived in the UK for an initial public offering (IPO) of his business and plans for his brand headquarters to be based in London.

He has since been based in London while being employed by Diamond Holdings for 20,000 pounds a month and also pursuing educational courses.

ALSO READ: Nirav Modi to be held in one of England's most overcrowded jails

"The allegations in India arose in an unusual way, leading him to engage lawyers in the UK, who have been in contact with the extradition squad of Scotland Yard since February 2018," Scott said, adding that his legal team has since repeatedly informed the UK authorities that he is "keen to fully cooperate" in any extradition matters.

It was claimed that the tacit arrangements being struck between Boutique Law and Scotland Yard were thrown awry due to the "widespread publicity" of the case worldwide and Modi was arrested as he tried to open a bank account in London.

"He is in possession of a wealth of material in support of his case and intends to make comprehensive arguments against the allegations, including that of political motivation and human rights," Scott noted.

Despite long-drawn arguments in support of his conduct as a tax-paying resident of London, the judge sent him to be held in custody at HMP Wandsworth prison in south London until the next hearing in the case on March 29.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.


    well contented report!
    2 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp