In first timer, rape victim argues for her case in Chhattisgarh High Court

The court asked the local police onwhy there has been no arrest after the FIR had been lodged.

Published: 15th May 2019 11:06 PM  |   Last Updated: 15th May 2019 11:06 PM   |  A+A-

court, order, hammer, high court

Image used for representational purpose only

Express News Service

RAIPUR: For the first time in the history of Chhattisgarh High Court, a rape victim stood before the judge to plead and argue for her case seeking justice.

Appearing before a single bench of Justice Sanjay K Agrawal after her petition was filed, she sought permission to argue the case herself which was granted by the court apparently going by the seriousness of the issue.

After hearing her argument, the court issued a notice to the Bilaspur superintendent of police Abhishek Meena asking why there has been no arrest after the FIR had been lodged. Meena has also been ordered to submit the reply with an affidavit before the court by May 17.

The victim, who hails from West Bengal, stated that she couldn’t afford to engage a lawyer to fight her case though she knew an advocate could be made available from the legal aid cell. But she affirmed that being a victim of sexual assault and based on the police inaction, she feels that she can present her case herself without any legal counsel.

However, the police claimed that an FIR was lodged against the accused Shubham Lalwani, who is a resident of Rajnandgaon district and his accomplice Aneesh Khan. “She come to my office some 10 days ago and the same day the FIR was lodged at Sarkanda police station in Bilaspur, where the complaint has been registered. As per the preliminary information the victim was initially given a false promise by the alleged rapist to marry her but later he refused. He is absconding”, Meena told the New Indian Express.

The accused, finding the victim alone in a house, had allegedly raped her after which he pledged to marry her as a compromise. Though the victim agreed to the compromise, she reported the matter to the police after the accused took back his promise.

Last month, the Supreme Court had ruled that sex on the pretext of marriage is rape. A bench of Justice L Nageshwara Rao and Justice MR Shah made the observation in the context of a case registered by a woman accusing a Chhattisgarh-based doctor, with whom she had a love affair, of raping her in 2013.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp