Anti-Sikh riots: SC directs examination of ex-Congress leader Sajjan Kumar's health condition 

The top court sought a report in four weeks from the panel of doctors constituted by the AIIMS director after Kumar sought an urgent listing of his bail plea on health grounds.

Published: 06th November 2019 01:29 PM  |   Last Updated: 07th November 2019 08:47 AM   |  A+A-

Sajjan Kumar 1984 anti sikh Riots

Sajjan Kumar (File Photo | PTI)


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed that former Congress leader Sajjan Kumar, sentenced to life imprisonment in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case, be examined by a panel of AIIMS doctors after he sought an urgent listing of his bail plea on health grounds.

The top court refused to urgently hear Kumar's bail plea and said that it would hear the bail application in the summer vacation next year.

Kumar was awarded life imprisonment by the Delhi High Court on December 17 last year.

The former Congress leader claimed to have lost eight to 10 kg weight in the 11 months he has spent in jail and said that he has been suffering from various other ailments.

A bench of Justice S A Bobde, S Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari also asked for a report in four weeks from the panel of doctors constituted by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) director on the health condition of Kumar.

"We are of the view that the health condition of petitioners (Kumar) be examined by a panel of doctors constituted by the AIIMS director. Report the file in four weeks," the bench said.

Senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for Kumar, said he has been in jail for the past 11 months and has lost around eight to 10 kg of weight.

He said Kumar has been suffering from various ailments, has serious health issues and his bail application should be heard urgently by the court.

To this, the bench said losing weight does not mean that he is unhealthy but still "we will order examination of his health conditions by a panel of doctors".

Senior advocates Dushyant Dave and H S Phoolka, appearing for the complainant of the case, said that the prosecution sided with the culprits for 30 years.

On August 5, a bench headed by Justice Bobde had said it would hear Kumar's bail plea in May 2020 as it was not an "ordinary case" and required a detailed hearing before any order is passed.

Kumar resigned from the Congress after he was convicted by the high court.

The case in which he was convicted and sentenced relates to the killing of five Sikhs in Delhi Cantonment's Raj Nagar Part-I area of southwest Delhi on November 1-2 in 1984, and burning down of a gurdwara in Raj Nagar Part-II.

Anti-Sikh riots had broken out after the assassination of then prime minister Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984, by her two Sikh bodyguards.

Kumar has also challenged in the apex court the Delhi High Court's verdict of December 17 last year that awarded him life imprisonment for the "remainder of his natural life" in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.

The high court had convicted him for the offences of criminal conspiracy and abetment in the commission of crimes of murder, promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of communal harmony and defiling and destruction of a gurdwara.

It had also upheld the conviction and varying sentences awarded by a trial court to five others - former Congress councillor Balwan Khokhar, retired naval officer Captain Bhagmal, Girdhari Lal and ex-MLAs Mahender Yadav and Kishan Khokhar.

The high court had set aside the trial court's 2010 verdict, which had acquitted Kumar in the case.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp