Guru Ravidas Temple: SC agrees to hear plea for permanent structure

The petition by Tanwar said that the Guru Ravidas Sarovar, that exists next to the temple, has to be restored as per the Centre's offer.
Supreme Court (Photo | PTI)
Supreme Court (Photo | PTI)

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a plea seeking the construction of a permanent structure for the Guru Ravidas temple in the Tughlaqabad forest area here instead of a wooden porta cabin as suggested by the Centre.

The top court had on October 21 accepted the Centre's revised offer of allotting 400 square metres land at the site for re-construction of the temple which was demolished by the DDA in August following its previous order.

A bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Indira Banerjee said it would hear the plea filed by former Member of Parliament Ashok Tanwar and others on November 25.

During the hearing, senior advocate Vikas Singh and advocate Virag Gupta, appearing for Tanwar, said they had informed the apex court during the hearing of the matter on October 21 that the Centre's offer of porta cabin made of wood was not acceptable to them.

They said the court had also said that the temple should be a permanent structure and not a porta cabin but it was not reflected in the order may be due to typographical and clerical mistakes.

The petition by Tanwar said that the Guru Ravidas Sarovar, that exists next to the temple, has to be restored as per the Centre's offer.

It said the Central government's offer, however, states that a boundary fence will be constructed in the area of 400 square feet.

"It is submitted that this fence will exclude the Guru Ravidas Sarovar and samadhis, which inexplicably form parts of the temple and religious activities conducted therein," the plea said.

The petition sought a direction that the boundary fence will enclose the Guru Ravidas Pond and the samadhis so that they are included in the temple complex.

The temple was demolished by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) following the apex court's August 9 direction which had said, "Let the premises be vacated by tomorrow and structure be removed by the DDA with the help of the police".

The demolition had led to massive outcry and protests in the national capital and other parts of the country.

The Centre had earlier offered to give 200 sq mt area for the temple's construction but later revised the proposal to 400 sq mt keeping in view the faith and sentiments of the devotees.

The Central government had said it would constitute a committee for managing the temple's affairs after which the top court had directed it to constitute within six weeks the committee for the construction of the temple in the area earmarked.

The top court had also made it clear that nobody would carry out any commercial activity in the area in and around the place earmarked for the temple.

The Centre had earlier said that consultations with all parties, including devotees and government officials, were held after which it was agreed that the same land will be given for the temple's construction considering the importance of the site for the devotees.

The DDA had demolished the temple pursuant to the orders of the apex court, which had observed that "serious breach" had been committed by Guru Ravidas Jayanti Samaroh Samiti by not vacating the forest area as earlier ordered by the top court.

The temple's demolition had led to a series of protests in places such as Delhi, Punjab and Haryana and the apex court had on August 19 directed the authorities in these areas to ensure that no violations of law and order take place for political benefits or otherwise.

The top court had earlier warned against politicising the temple's demolition and said it would initiate contempt proceedings against those provoking protests and demonstrations.

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com