Setback for Fadnavis as SC says Maharashtra CM will have to face probe in poll affidavit case

The apex court also set aside earlier Bombay HC order which had given clean chit to Fadnavis in case of suppression of criminal matters in poll affidavit.

Published: 01st October 2019 12:02 PM  |   Last Updated: 01st October 2019 12:21 PM   |  A+A-

Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis

Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis (Photo | PTI)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: In a huge setback to Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, the Supreme Court on Tuesday paved way for his prosecution for not disclosing two pending criminal cases in his 2014 affidavit.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi pronounced its verdict on a plea seeking prosecution of Fadnavis under the provisions of the Representation of the People (RP) Act for allegedly failing to furnish details of two pending criminal cases, in which the trial court had taken cognizance, in his election affidavit. 

The case has been filed by Satish Ukey.

The bench set aside the Bombay High Court and a trial court order that gave clean chit to Fadnavis in the case and said, “the clean chit given to Fadnavis in the false affidavit case is untenable in law and hence we are quashing it.”

The court has also ordered the trial court to consider afresh the complaint filed by Uke now.

Ukey had contended that the chief minister filed a false affidavit by not disclosing the two criminal matters and yet the trial court and the high court held that there was no prima facie case to be made out for the chief minister's prosecution.

He had said that a candidate was under a mandatory legal obligation to disclose the details of all the cases, in which either charges have been framed or the trial court had taken cognizance, in the nomination papers.

The petitioner had alleged that Fadnavis, in his election affidavit filed in 2014, had failed to disclose the pendency of two criminal cases against him. 

It was contended that the chief minister did not disclose the information as required of him under the election law and the non-disclosure of these cases was in violation of Section 125A of the RP Act and constituted an offence in itself.

The two cases of alleged cheating and forgery were filed against Fadnavis in 1996 and 1998 but charges were not framed.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp