Silent bar can’t lead to strong SC: Advocates, politicans on Prashant Bhushan case

Legal experts feel contempt order against Bhushan will prevent free debate on court’s role.

Published: 15th August 2020 02:37 AM  |   Last Updated: 15th August 2020 09:44 AM   |  A+A-

Advocate Prashant Bhushan

Advocate Prashant Bhushan (Photo | EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI:  Holding advocate Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt of court, the Supreme Court on Friday said punishing a lawyer was an extreme measure, but nevertheless necessary to keep the streams of justice pure and undefiled. 

“Judiciary is the central pillar of Indian democracy. It is the duty of the court to punish to preserve its dignity,” the order emphasised.

However, legal experts begged to differ, saying criticism doesn’t amount to contempt.

“The judgment in Prashant Bhushan case will discourage lawyers from being outspoken. A silenced bar cannot lead to a strong court,” said senior advocate Sanjay Hegde. 

Advocate Apar Gupta tweeted, “Criticism of the Supreme Court even when unfair is not contempt. It is for the love of an institution that upholds an ideal of social justice and fundamental rights.”

Supreme Court Advocate on Record Anas Tanvir said, “The power of contempt is to be sparsely used. This has been a stated rule since forever. The absolute power that contempt is needs to be wielded with much care. It may seem that the Supreme Court became a little too sensitive about Prashant Bhushan’s comments.  A similar sensitivity was not shown when Justice R Banumathi was abused on Twitter for mentioning her religion or when a functionary of the ruling party said that the top court is in their hands.”

Echoing similar views, advocate Krishna Sharma said, “The Supreme Court is a public institution and the judges are open to criticism. So these things should not become the subject matter of contempt.”Eminent persons from other fields also expressed disappointment in the judgment.

Historian Ramchandra Guha tweeted, “Through this act, the Supreme Court has let itself down, and has let the Republic down too. A dark day for Indian democracy.” 

CPM leader Sitaram Yechury tweeted, “The judgment will prevent open and free discussion on the role of the SC in India’s democracy.”


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp