1984 anti-Sikh riots: SC-appointed Dhingra panel faults Delhi cops, courts for closed cases

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the bench headed by CJI S A Bobde that the government had accepted the report and would take necessary action as per the recommendations.

Published: 16th January 2020 04:42 AM  |   Last Updated: 16th January 2020 01:01 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (File Photo | PTI)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: Blaming the Delhi Police for ‘hushing up’ the investigation in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots cases, a Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation team has also faulted the courts for ‘not conducting the trial’ in the cases as per the procedure.

In its report submitted to the Supreme Court, the Justice S N Dhingra Committee, which re-examined 186 closed cases pertaining to the riots, said “the whole effort of the police and the administration has been to hush up the criminal cases concerning riots”.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the bench headed by CJI S A Bobde that the government had accepted the report and would take the necessary action as per the recommendations.

The panel noted that hundreds of affidavits were received by Justice Rangnath Misra Commission with respect to killing, arson and looting by the rioters. But instead of directing the registration of FIRs, committee after the committee was formed which further delayed the registration of cases for years.

The report recommended action against SHO S S Tyagi of the Kalyanpuri police station in Delhi, saying he had ‘disarmed Sikhs’ making them vulnerable and was ‘involved in conspiracy’ with others. The case should be referred to the riots cell, it said.

The SIT was set up in January 2018 to sift through the records and supervise further probe into these 186 cases in which closure reports were filed earlier.

ALSO READ | 1984 riots: Sikhs dragged out of trains and killed, police arrested none from spot, says SIT

The report stated as to how the police employed several tactics to dilute the cases and cited a case wherein an omnibus FIR was filed on 337 separate complaints about incidents which had no connection to each other.

“The police deliberately made it humanly impossible for themselves to investigate complaints. How can one investigating officer probe 500 cases, trace witnesses, prepare challans and proceed in court against accused persons?” read the report.

“Despite a large number of victims approaching various agencies soon after the riots, and for a few years thereafter, a large number of murders, rioting, looting and arson remained unpunished and untraced. The basic reason for these crimes remaining unpunished and culprits going scot-free was lack of interest shown by the police and by the authorities in handling these cases as per law or to proceed with the intention of punishing the culprits,” it stated.

ALSO READ | Anti-Sikh riots: SIT recommends appeal against acquittal by 2 sessions judges

Justice Dhingra also named S S Bal, the judge mandated to try all riots cases in Delhi from 1989 to 1995.

“It is not understood how the courts proceeded with trial of several crimes of rioting, murders, arson, looting which took place at different locations, at different times and even on different dates, together. This was a major reason of the failure of several cases because the accused persons were wise enough to drag the trial by absenting one after another on trial dates,” the report noted, adding that “acquittals were handed over by judges to accused of 1984 riots in a routine manner”.

“None of the judgments on record show that the judges were alive to the situation of riots and to the fact that for the delay in lodging FIRs and statement of witnesses, the victims were not responsible,” the report stated while recommending to explore the possibility of filing an appeal in certain cases.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp