Charitable hospital treated just four poor, needy patients in lockdown: Bombay HC told

However, it is not clear whether these patients were infected by coronavirus.

Published: 20th June 2020 05:18 PM  |   Last Updated: 20th June 2020 05:18 PM   |  A+A-

COVID Hospitals

For representational purposes (Photo | PTI)


MUMBAI: Despite reserving 20 per cent of its beds for poor and needy persons, a charitable hospital here had treated only four such patients - three in May and another in June - during the coronavirus-induced lockdown, the Bombay High Court has been told.

However, it is not clear whether these patients were infected by coronavirus.

The state charity commissioner revealed this detail in an affidavit following a probe into an alleged incident of K J Somaiya Hospital charging Rs 12.5 lakh from some 'poor' patients for COVID-19 treatment.

However, the affidavit also stated the petitioners - seven residents of an SRA building in suburban Bandra- have not disclosed their income status, supported by any documentary evidence, which would make them eligible for free treatment.

The petitioners have sought refund of hospital bills.

During the inquiry, the hospital contended the government resolution (GR) capping the prices for COVID-19 treatment, reserving 20 per cent beds and offering free treatment for the poor, came into effect on April 30 and May 21 respectively, which was after the patients were discharged.

Last week, the seven residents had approached the high court alleging that the hospital had charged them Rs 12.5 lakh for treatment and had threatened to stop their discharge if they failed to pay the money.

In their plea filed through advocate Vivek Shukla, the petitioners had sought a refund saying that the hospital was bound to reserve beds for the poor and provide them free treatment since it was run by a charitable trust.

A bench of Justices R D Dhanuka and Madhav Jamdar had then directed the state charity commissioner to conduct an inquiry in the matter.

In an affidavit submitted before the HC on Friday, the charity commissioner said while the hospital had reserved 20 per cent beds for persons from indigent and economically weaker sections, it had treated only four such patients since the lockdown came into force.

The first phase of coronavirus-induced lockdown came into effect on midnight of March 24.

According to the state charity commissioner, the hospital had treated three patients under the scheme for indigent and poor patients during the lockdown period till the end of May, while one such patient was treated in June.

However, there were no complaints about the hospital denying treatment to any patient during this period, the affidavit stated.

"The full inquiry report is awaited. However, it is clear that the hospital is not adhering to state's mandate on providing free COVID-19 treatment, and free or subsidised non-COVID-19 treatment for the poor," advocate Shukla claimed.

On April 30, the state government had issued a GR capping prices for COVID-19 treatment in private and charitable hospitals and On May 21, it had issued another resolution mandating that such hospitals reserve 20 per cent beds and offer free treatment to the poor.

The treatment of six of the petitioners was already over on April 28 before the GRs dated April 30 and May 21 were passed, the affidavit stated.

The court is likely to hear the matter further on June 23.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp