Centre refuses to fund trial for assessing HCQ role in preventing COVID-19

The Centre instead chose to go ahead with an observational study, considered 'poor quality' in scientific research.

Published: 20th May 2020 08:19 PM  |   Last Updated: 20th May 2020 08:23 PM   |  A+A-


Image used for representation.

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Centre has refused to fund a crucial randomised control trial to assess the effectiveness of anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine for preventing COVID-19 among healthcare workers while choosing instead to go ahead with an observational study, considered "poor quality" in scientific research.

The proposal designed by the New Delhi-based George Institute of Public Health, in collaboration with doctors from Apollo Hospitals, Tamil Nadu and St John Medical College, Karnataka aimed to evaluate whether a strategy of prophylaxis with HCQ taken weekly for 3 months reduces the risk of acquiring symptomatic COVID-19 infections in over 10,000 healthcare workers.

However, the pitch did not find favour with two government agencies--India’s top health research body, Indian Council of Medical Research and the department of biotechnology under the Union Ministry of Science and Technology.

The decision has raised eyebrows as the chorus is growing against an ICMR advisory, issued nearly two months back asking all high risk individuals to take HCQ, as the evidence is now growing that the medicine may not be useful at all for the treatment or prevention of the disease and may be harmful in several cases.

ALSO READ| Centre advises dentists to take HCQ, allows them to resume services with major restrictions

Those who have recommended HCQ in the March 23 advisory include healthcare workers treating COVID-19 patients and close contacts of those for infected.  HCQ is known to have cardio-toxicity effect for many and can be even fatal for those with heart diseases such as history of prolonged QT interval. 

"While DBT turned down the proposal saying ICMR has already started an observational study to evaluate the risk, ICMR itself called a meeting to discuss it and then cancelled it later without offering any explaination," Dr Vivekanand Jha, Executive Director of GIPH told The New Indian Express.

"It is both disappointing and perplexing as poor quality science should not be given precendence at any cost," he added pointing at the observational study started by ICMR that will simply monitor health of 2000 healthcare workers taking HCQ at six medical centres.

The office of DBT secretary Renu Swarup, when reached for a comment, said that a high level committee did not recommend the project as it fell under ICMR's domain. Message and email sent to ICMR director general Dr Balram Bhargava have remained unanswered.

Dr RR Gangakhedkar, chief epidemiologist at the ICMR, on Wednesday said in a press briefing that it is "reviewing" the earlier guidelines.

Meanwhile, bioethicists pointed out that while ideally, the ICMR advisory should not have been issued in March without proper evidence—an effort to look for good quality evidence being shunted was even worse.

"A properly done RCT is the only way to scientifically evaluate the efficacy of a drug and it should  not be comprised for a lesser quality study, especially by country’s top health research agency," said Dr Anant Bhan, a researcher in bioethics, public health and policy.

He wondered if the ICMR may have down the proposal thinking that a negative outcome will show it in bad light later.

Sources in the Union Health Mministry and ICMR conceded that the government is rethinking its earlier recommendation to include HCQ for both treatment and prohylaxis of COVID-19. Meanwhile, Jha said that he is still looking for funding to take forward his project which has received ethical clearance.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp