SC asks Centre to ensure no smog in Delhi-NCR

The Centre on Thursday appointed former Chief Secretary of Delhi M M Kutty chairperson of the Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas.

Published: 06th November 2020 02:16 PM  |   Last Updated: 06th November 2020 03:22 PM   |  A+A-

Delhi-NCR pollution, air pollution, smog

Vehicles ply on a road in a smog affected area in Gurugram Thursday. (Photo | PTI)


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Friday asked the Centre to ensure there is no smog in Delhi-NCR as it was informed that the commission for air quality management will start functioning from today.

A bench of Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian posted the pleas related to air pollution for hearing after the Diwali vacation.

The Centre on Thursday appointed former Chief Secretary of Delhi M M Kutty chairperson of the Commission for Air Quality Management (AQM) in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, informed the bench that the Commission will start functioning from Friday and the government has appointed the members.

While referring to the recent ordinance on Air Pollution, Mehta said that he would place it on record.

The bench told the Solicitor General that he may place it on record but the court will hear the matter after Diwali vacation.

“The only thing is that you ensure that there is no smog in the city.

We are not concerned with commission.

There are many commissions and many brains are working but just ensure that there is no smog in the city,” the bench said.

Mehta replied that government is taking all efforts on war footing.

Senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for petitioner Aditya Dubey, said the chairman of the commission is a bureaucrat and it could have been a retired judge of the HC.

“There is no member from the Union health ministry,” he said.

The bench said the commission can talk to anybody in the country.

Singh contended that there is no classification of offence and Rs 1 crore fine and five year jail is a little bit arbitrary.

The bench pointed out that all offences in the ordinance are non-cognizable, to which Singh replied that these are cognizable.

It told Mehta that there is no grading of offence to which he said that government will like to respond to it.

"We don't want to advise. These are all knowledgeable people and there are NGO people also," the bench said.

Mehta pointed that there are experts from the field besides members from NGOs in the newly created commission and they will all start working from Friday.

Singh added that the situation today is almost of a public health emergency and something drastic needs to be done.

The bench said, “We are a court of law.

This is a problem which has to be dealt with by the executive.

They have the money, the power and the resources for this.

We are not abdicating our responsibility or functions but understand this, we have some limitations”.

Singh said that by the time court will reopen after vacation, it (pollution) may all be over.

The bench said that it will keep the matter on reopening after the Diwali vacation.

On October 29, the top court was informed by the Centre that it has come out with an Ordinance on curbing pollution and it has been promulgated already.

The top court had said that it would have to look at the Ordinance before passing any direction in the matter which has raised issues regarding pollution caused due to stubble burning in neighbouring states of Delhi.

The apex court had on October 26 kept in abeyance its earlier order appointing one-man panel of retired apex court judge Justice Madan B Lokur to monitor the steps taken by neighbouring states to prevent stubble burning which is a major cause of pollution in the Delhi-national capital region (NCR).

“Some experts have informed us informally that it is not only stubble burning that creates pollution,” the CJI had said.

“We would like you to stop using your beautiful cars.

Which you won't.

We should all go about on bikes -- not motorbikes but bicycles,” the CJI had observed.

Earlier, the apex court had kept in abeyance its October 16 order appointing one-man panel of Justice (retd) Lokur while considering the Centre's stand that it is coming out with a comprehensive legislation to deal with air pollution, including the aspect of stubble burning.

Mehta had told the bench that the Centre has taken a “holistic view” of the matter and the draft of the proposed law on curbing pollution would be submitted in the apex court within four days.

In its October 16 order, the top court had directed deployment of National Cadet Corps, National Service Scheme and Bharat Scouts and Guides for assisting in the monitoring of stubble burning in the agricultural fields of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi-NCR, saying all it wants is that “people of Delhi-NCR can breathe fresh air without any pollution”.

It had raised concern over the worsening air quality in Delhi-NCR and appointed one-man panel of Justice (retd) Lokur to monitor the steps taken by the neighbouring states to prevent stubble burning, while brushing aside objections of the Centre, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana.

During his tenure as an apex court judge, Justice Lokur who headed social-justice bench had dealt with pollution matters which included the aspect of stubble burning.

The top court is also hearing a separate plea filed in 1985 by environmentalist M C Mehta on air pollution and had last year even taken a suo motu note of alarming rise in air pollution in Delhi-NCR where several directions have been passed with regard to stubble burning.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp