'Enforcing COVID norms is responsibility of state authorities': EC day after Madras HC rapping

The commission also asserted that it has continuously directed state and district authorities to enforce instructions of the NDMA to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.

Published: 27th April 2021 09:05 PM  |   Last Updated: 27th April 2021 09:05 PM   |  A+A-

Voters stand in a queue to cast their votes at a polling station in Bengal.

Voters stand in a queue to cast their votes at a polling station in Bengal. (Photo | PTI)


NEW DELHI: Facing flak over its alleged failure to ensure COVID-19 appropriate behaviour during poll campaigns, the Election Commission on Tuesday said enforcing provisions of the law to fight the pandemic is the responsibility of state disaster management bodies.

The commission also asserted that it has continuously directed state and district authorities to enforce instructions of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.

The poll panel underlined that on "no occasion" it takes over the task of a state disaster management authority (SDMA) for enforcement of instructions issued in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Election Commission's (EC) remarks came a day after the Madras High Court made harsh observations against it for failing to enforce COVID appropriate behaviour during poll campaigns.

Elections have been held in Assam, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and the Union Territory of Puducherry.

The last of the eight phase West Bengal polls is on Thursday.

Counting for votes for all the assembly elections is on May 2.

The commission in a statement said while it will comply with all directions of the high court, on April 30, during the next hearing, it will apprise the bench of all the steps already taken by the poll panel for free, fair and safe elections.

It also said "statements being attributed to the Hon'ble High Court in certain sections of media" do not find mention in the order which was finally passed.

The EC was apparently referring to the oral observations made by the bench against it.

Referring to the petition that was moved in the Madras High Court to ensure "COVID safe" counting on May 2, the statement said that similar petitions concerning COVID-19 compliant behaviour during ongoing elections were filed, and the EC had already responded to them.

The commission gave out "legal and factual positions" to drive home the point that it did everything possible at its end to ensure "COVID safe" polls, it said.

The poll panel said enforcement of COVID-19 measures is the responsibility assigned to a state disaster management authority.

These measures include lockdowns, restriction or curtailment on public gatherings, and the authority's officers follow the Disaster Management Act, 2005, it said.

Public gatherings under the Act were not stopped during this (election campaign) period by the state authority, the EC said.

Whatever was prescribed, the EC directed all to adhere to it and in case of violation to book offenders under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the statement said.

The EC continuously directed the state and district authorities to enforce the prevailing instructions of the NDMA and SDMA, it said.

Last year, amid lockdown and other enforcement measures under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the commission completed the electoral exercise in Bihar, the statement said.

The Bihar assembly elections were held in October-November last year.

"The enforcement under the 2005 Act has to be ensured by the concerned SDMA and notified authorities under the Act. The commission has always emphasised in its August 21, 2020 and all subsequent instructions that the state authorities shall ensure COVID (norms) compliance in the matter of public gatherings for campaign purposes," it said.

The EC pointed out that it reiterated its instructions on February 26 this year while announcing the poll in the four states and the union territory, including Tamil Nadu.

"The campaign ended in April. Fortunately, the second wave of COVID-19 was yet to be visible fully by that time. Polling was conducted following all prescribed COVID appropriate measures on April 6 which witnessed good electoral participation with full compliance of norms by all concerned," it said.

The EC said these submissions were made before different high courts wherever opportunity was afforded to the commission and found favour in their orders.

The statement pointed out that Tamil Nadu ordered lockdown restrictions in view of the second COVID surge from April 20, 16 days after the campaign period was already over in Tamil Nadu.

India Matters


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Dr T K Gopalan

    Madras HC is apparently not prepared to put any part of the blame on the state authorities while it berates the ECI with rhetoric.
    2 years ago reply
  • BSM

    What about long delayed justices to common people through vayadas/postponement? Isn't it a murder by not concluding cases witin a period of max 6 month? Isn't it time to view cases in serial order and stop hearing of political cases overnight? Can we look for answers to these?
    2 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp